The Role of Hospice and Palliative Medicine in the <i>Ars Moriendi</i>

There is disagreement among physicians and medical ethicists on the precise goals of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM). Some think that HPM's goals should differ from those of other branches of medicine and aim primarily at lessening pain, discomfort, and confusion, while others think that HPM's practices should aim, like all other branches of medicine, at promoting health. I take the latter position: using the ars moriendi to set a standard for what it means to die well, I argue that if HPM's practices were to aim at mitigating suffering with little regard to promoting health, some patients would die worse deaths than if HPM's practices were to aim at health. According to the ars moriendi, flourishing at the end of one's life requires that persons exercise their agency and pursue the goods most important to them. On this view, HPM's practices should promote patients' health to enable them to pursue these goods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhae039
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Hospice and Palliative Medicine in the Ars Moriendi

Levi Durham
3 citations
The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.63
article

The Role of Hospice and Palliative Medicine in the Ars Moriendi

Levi Durham
article en
3 citations

Abstract

There is disagreement among physicians and medical ethicists on the precise goals of Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM). Some think that HPM's goals should differ from those of other branches of medicine and aim primarily at lessening pain, discomfort, and confusion, while others think that HPM's practices should aim, like all other branches of medicine, at promoting health. I take the latter position: using the ars moriendi to set a standard for what it means to die well, I argue that if HPM's practices were to aim at mitigating suffering with little regard to promoting health, some patients would die worse deaths than if HPM's practices were to aim at health. According to the ars moriendi, flourishing at the end of one's life requires that persons exercise their agency and pursue the goods most important to them. On this view, HPM's practices should promote patients' health to enable them to pursue these goods.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of MedicineVol. 50(1)
Baylor University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.