A case study of an ESOP-owned holding company: lessons learned and suggested research topics

Purpose This case study presents an ESOP-owned holding company, Folience, describing the company’s history and holding company structure and strategy. The purpose is to highlight several advantages of the ESOP-owned holding company and concludes with lessons learned and suggestions for research. Design/methodology/approach The case study design is descriptive and relies on proprietary knowledge and observation, along with access to documents, discussions, meetings and other primary resources and interactions. Findings The case study highlights several advantages of the ESOP-owned holding company structure: diversification, greater access to capital, transformation of culture, sustainability and the path to convert businesses to employee ownership. It draws lessons from observations and concludes with suggestions for additional research. Research limitations/implications This is a single holding company case study, heavily reliant on participant observation by the author. Practical implications This case study describes an innovative ESOP holding company whose design may be replicable. Social implications The social impact is that ESOP-owned holding companies are shown to be a path for transitioning companies to being employee-owned and creating economic and cultural gains in doing so. The literature suggests that creating more employee-owned companies, and more employee owners, could have positive social and financial benefits for employees, their families and their communities. Originality/value This case study describes an innovative ESOP holding company whose design may be replicable. The social impact is that ESOP-owned holding companies are shown to be a path for transitioning companies to being employee-owned and creating economic and cultural gains in doing so. The literature suggests that creating more employee-owned companies, and more employee owners, could have positive social and financial benefits for employees, their families and their communities. There has been little or no focus, by case study or research, specific to the differentiation of and advantages of ESOP-owned holding companies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jpeo-11-2023-0011
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A case study of an ESOP-owned holding company: lessons learned and suggested research topics

Daniel Goldstein
1 citations
Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
0.54
article

A case study of an ESOP-owned holding company: lessons learned and suggested research topics

Daniel Goldstein
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This case study presents an ESOP-owned holding company, Folience, describing the company’s history and holding company structure and strategy. The purpose is to highlight several advantages of the ESOP-owned holding company and concludes with lessons learned and suggestions for research. Design/methodology/approach The case study design is descriptive and relies on proprietary knowledge and observation, along with access to documents, discussions, meetings and other primary resources and interactions. Findings The case study highlights several advantages of the ESOP-owned holding company structure: diversification, greater access to capital, transformation of culture, sustainability and the path to convert businesses to employee ownership. It draws lessons from observations and concludes with suggestions for additional research. Research limitations/implications This is a single holding company case study, heavily reliant on participant observation by the author. Practical implications This case study describes an innovative ESOP holding company whose design may be replicable. Social implications The social impact is that ESOP-owned holding companies are shown to be a path for transitioning companies to being employee-owned and creating economic and cultural gains in doing so. The literature suggests that creating more employee-owned companies, and more employee owners, could have positive social and financial benefits for employees, their families and their communities. Originality/value This case study describes an innovative ESOP holding company whose design may be replicable. The social impact is that ESOP-owned holding companies are shown to be a path for transitioning companies to being employee-owned and creating economic and cultural gains in doing so. The literature suggests that creating more employee-owned companies, and more employee owners, could have positive social and financial benefits for employees, their families and their communities. There has been little or no focus, by case study or research, specific to the differentiation of and advantages of ESOP-owned holding companies.

Journal of Participation and Employee OwnershipVol. 7(3)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Global Financial Regulation and Crises
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.