Nongovernmental organizations, collective payments for ecosystem services programs, and forest loss: A cross‐national analysis

Abstract Objective We evaluate the debate concerning the impact of collective nongovernmental organization payment for ecosystem services on forest loss in low‐ and middle‐income nations. Methods We analyze data for a sample of 79 low‐ and middle‐income nations using a two‐stage least squares regression model to address endogeneity on the payment for ecosystem services variable. Results We find that collective nongovernmental organization led payment for ecosystem services programs correspond to less forest loss in low‐ and middle‐income nations. We also find that agricultural exports, agricultural land area, total population growth, rural population growth, and urban population growth are related to increased forest loss. Conclusion We conclude that nongovernmental organizations can cooperate with Indigenous populations in low‐ and middle‐income nations to protect forests by using payment for ecosystem services programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13458
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nongovernmental organizations, collective payments for ecosystem services programs, and forest loss: A cross‐national analysis

Jamie Sommer, John M. Shandra, Laura A. McKinney
Social Science Quarterly
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Nongovernmental organizations, collective payments for ecosystem services programs, and forest loss: A cross‐national analysis

Jamie Sommer, John M. Shandra, Laura A. McKinney
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective We evaluate the debate concerning the impact of collective nongovernmental organization payment for ecosystem services on forest loss in low‐ and middle‐income nations. Methods We analyze data for a sample of 79 low‐ and middle‐income nations using a two‐stage least squares regression model to address endogeneity on the payment for ecosystem services variable. Results We find that collective nongovernmental organization led payment for ecosystem services programs correspond to less forest loss in low‐ and middle‐income nations. We also find that agricultural exports, agricultural land area, total population growth, rural population growth, and urban population growth are related to increased forest loss. Conclusion We conclude that nongovernmental organizations can cooperate with Indigenous populations in low‐ and middle‐income nations to protect forests by using payment for ecosystem services programs.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 105(7)
Tulane University (US), University of South Florida (US), Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nongovernmental organizations, collective payments for ecosystem services programs, and forest loss: A cross‐national analysis — Jamie Sommer, John M. Shandra, et al. · Social Science Quarterly (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS