The citizens have participated – what now? An action research study of factors impacting the use of participatory citizen knowledge in planning processes

Citizen participation is embedded into planning practice and policy, yet it remains unclear how the results of participation are shared in planning organisations and utilised to inform planning outcomes. This article examines barriers and enablers for systematic gathering, sharing and utilisation of participatory citizen knowledge and analyses the collaborative development of knowledge-sharing practices in two Finnish municipalities. The article focuses specifically on the collection and dissemination of local, experiential knowledge from two municipality-wide Public Participation GIS surveys. The study adopts an action research approach to deepen the understanding of planners' complex relationships with participatory citizen knowledge: how they gather and share it, how it informs their work and how they develop their everyday practice. The results suggest that a variety of practical, technical and cultural factors influence whether planners access and utilise gathered citizen knowledge. Planners' backgrounds, skills and personalities also influence how they perceive and utilise citizen knowledge. When provided with accessible and representative data about citizens' behaviours and preferences, adequate resources and a sense of agency through supportive organisation culture, officials from different sectors were eager to develop the use of participatory knowledge. These emergent practices can be used to inform wider iterative development to meet practitioners' needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Planning Studies
Published
2024-10-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2024.2416001
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Geographic Information Systems Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The citizens have participated – what now? An action research study of factors impacting the use of participatory citizen knowledge in planning processes

Saana Rossi, Eveliina Harsia, Anna Kajosaari, Marketta Kyttä
8 citations
European Planning Studies
Geographic Information Systems Studies
15.65
article

The citizens have participated – what now? An action research study of factors impacting the use of participatory citizen knowledge in planning processes

Saana Rossi, Eveliina Harsia, Anna Kajosaari, Marketta Kyttä
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Citizen participation is embedded into planning practice and policy, yet it remains unclear how the results of participation are shared in planning organisations and utilised to inform planning outcomes. This article examines barriers and enablers for systematic gathering, sharing and utilisation of participatory citizen knowledge and analyses the collaborative development of knowledge-sharing practices in two Finnish municipalities. The article focuses specifically on the collection and dissemination of local, experiential knowledge from two municipality-wide Public Participation GIS surveys. The study adopts an action research approach to deepen the understanding of planners' complex relationships with participatory citizen knowledge: how they gather and share it, how it informs their work and how they develop their everyday practice. The results suggest that a variety of practical, technical and cultural factors influence whether planners access and utilise gathered citizen knowledge. Planners' backgrounds, skills and personalities also influence how they perceive and utilise citizen knowledge. When provided with accessible and representative data about citizens' behaviours and preferences, adequate resources and a sense of agency through supportive organisation culture, officials from different sectors were eager to develop the use of participatory knowledge. These emergent practices can be used to inform wider iterative development to meet practitioners' needs.

European Planning StudiesVol. 33(1)
Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT), Institute for Urban and Regional Research (AT), Aalto University (FI)
NordForsk, Insinööritieteiden Korkeakoulu, Aalto-yliopisto
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Geographic Information Systems Studies
15.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.