Złożenie zabezpieczenia przez dłużnika oraz określenie przez sąd kwoty na zaspokojenie bieżących potrzeb. Uwagi na tle art. 821 § 1 k.p.c. oraz art. 821(1) k.p.c.

This article focuses on two issues: a security stipulated in Art. 821 § 1 of the Civil Procedure Code as regards the application of regulations on insolvency safeguard procedures and the nature of security in the court enforcement proceedings, as referred to in Art. 821 § 1 in fine of the Civil Procedure Code, and Art. 821(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, which provides for the court’s authority to define an amount necessary to meet the debtor’s ongoing needs during the suspension of enforcement proceedings. In the author’s opinion, the regulation is useless and questions the effectiveness of other protective regulations of the Civil Procedure Code. Keywords: enforcement proceedings, security, complaint about actions taken by the bailiff, appeal in court enforcement proceedings

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Przegląd Prawa Egzekucyjnego.
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62627/ppe.2024.024
Primary Topic
Polish Legal and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Złożenie zabezpieczenia przez dłużnika oraz określenie przez sąd kwoty na zaspokojenie bieżących potrzeb. Uwagi na tle art. 821 § 1 k.p.c. oraz art. 821(1) k.p.c.

Jakub Bródka
Przegląd Prawa Egzekucyjnego.
Polish Legal and Social Issues
article

Złożenie zabezpieczenia przez dłużnika oraz określenie przez sąd kwoty na zaspokojenie bieżących potrzeb. Uwagi na tle art. 821 § 1 k.p.c. oraz art. 821(1) k.p.c.

Jakub Bródka
article en

Abstract

This article focuses on two issues: a security stipulated in Art. 821 § 1 of the Civil Procedure Code as regards the application of regulations on insolvency safeguard procedures and the nature of security in the court enforcement proceedings, as referred to in Art. 821 § 1 in fine of the Civil Procedure Code, and Art. 821(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, which provides for the court’s authority to define an amount necessary to meet the debtor’s ongoing needs during the suspension of enforcement proceedings. In the author’s opinion, the regulation is useless and questions the effectiveness of other protective regulations of the Civil Procedure Code. Keywords: enforcement proceedings, security, complaint about actions taken by the bailiff, appeal in court enforcement proceedings

Przegląd Prawa Egzekucyjnego.Vol. 2024(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Polish Legal and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.