EVALUATION OF TEXTILE PRINTS PRINTED WITH INKJET PRINTER

In the rapidly evolving textile printing industry, it is critical to understand the impact of substrate properties on print quality. This study objectively compares the print quality and geometric deformations of typographic elements on paper and textile substrates using a large format inkjet printer. We evaluated print non-uniformity and geometric deviations by analysing prints on Microporous Satin Photo Paper and Blackout VI DirectTex textile fabric. Our analysis, conducted using ImageJ software, revealed that the textile substrate had significantly higher NU values and greater variations in both the area and perimeter of the typographic elements compared to the paper substrate. These deviations are attributed to the textured, uneven surface of the textile, the higher thread density and the greater bleeding of the ink, while the smoother paper substrate showed more consistent results. This study highlights the importance of substrate properties in assessing print quality and suggests that future research could focus on optimising materials and printing technologies to improve accuracy on different substrates.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24867/grid-2024-p11
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EVALUATION OF TEXTILE PRINTS PRINTED WITH INKJET PRINTER

Raša Urbas, Ana Mendizza
1 citations
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.20
article

EVALUATION OF TEXTILE PRINTS PRINTED WITH INKJET PRINTER

Raša Urbas, Ana Mendizza
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving textile printing industry, it is critical to understand the impact of substrate properties on print quality. This study objectively compares the print quality and geometric deformations of typographic elements on paper and textile substrates using a large format inkjet printer. We evaluated print non-uniformity and geometric deviations by analysing prints on Microporous Satin Photo Paper and Blackout VI DirectTex textile fabric. Our analysis, conducted using ImageJ software, revealed that the textile substrate had significantly higher NU values and greater variations in both the area and perimeter of the typographic elements compared to the paper substrate. These deviations are attributed to the textured, uneven surface of the textile, the higher thread density and the greater bleeding of the ink, while the smoother paper substrate showed more consistent results. This study highlights the importance of substrate properties in assessing print quality and suggests that future research could focus on optimising materials and printing technologies to improve accuracy on different substrates.

Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.