AI MODELS FOR PREDICTING VISUAL ATTENTION IN DIGITAL APPLICATIONS: A COMPARATIVE PILOT ANALYSIS WITH EYE TRACKING RESULTS

The paper presents a comparative pilot analysis of an AI-based visual attention prediction system with the traditional eye-tracking method in the context of UI/UX design. The study assesses the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated attention heatmaps compared to empirical eye-tracking data. The results indicate that AI systems show a strong ability to approximate human attention, achieving ROC-AUC values between 0.75 and 0.84. The study highlights AI's potential in early-stage design iterations, offering a suitable alternative to time-consuming eye-tracking testing sessions, but recommends combining AI tools with traditional methods for critical design decisions.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24867/grid-2024-p47
Citations
1
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI MODELS FOR PREDICTING VISUAL ATTENTION IN DIGITAL APPLICATIONS: A COMPARATIVE PILOT ANALYSIS WITH EYE TRACKING RESULTS

Gala Golubović, Neda Milić Keresteš, Tijana Janjić, Sandra Dedijer et al.
1 citations
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
0.34
article

AI MODELS FOR PREDICTING VISUAL ATTENTION IN DIGITAL APPLICATIONS: A COMPARATIVE PILOT ANALYSIS WITH EYE TRACKING RESULTS

Gala Golubović, Neda Milić Keresteš, Tijana Janjić, Sandra Dedijer, Živko Pavlović
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The paper presents a comparative pilot analysis of an AI-based visual attention prediction system with the traditional eye-tracking method in the context of UI/UX design. The study assesses the accuracy and reliability of AI-generated attention heatmaps compared to empirical eye-tracking data. The results indicate that AI systems show a strong ability to approximate human attention, achieving ROC-AUC values between 0.75 and 0.84. The study highlights AI's potential in early-stage design iterations, offering a suitable alternative to time-consuming eye-tracking testing sessions, but recommends combining AI tools with traditional methods for critical design decisions.

Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.