Anesthetic Gas Scavenging System for Gas Evacuation in the ICU

<b>Background:</b> Inhaled sedation is increasing in ICUs, with active carbon filters (ACFs) commonly used for evacuating halogenated gases. However, the potential benefits of a waste anesthetic gas system (WAGS) similar to the ones used in operating rooms should be explored. To limit the suction over the flow sensor where the WAGS is connected on ICU ventilators, an anesthetic gas receiving system (AGRS) is required, constituting with the WAGS an active gas receiving and scavenging system (AGRSS). Ensuring that this whole device does not compromise the flow sensor reliability is crucial. The aim of this study was to compare various gas evacuation devices and assess the reliability of AGRSS on ICU ventilators. <b>Methods:</b> In this experimental study, pressures and flows were recorded during the ventilation of a test lung using various ventilator settings and gas evacuation methods: no device (reference condition), ACF, the WAGS alone, AGRSS (WAGS and AGRS together), and the expiratory valve connected to the medical vacuum system with the AGRS in between. Visual comparisons of the pressure and flow curves followed by a statistical analysis comparing median pressures and flows of each device to the reference were performed. <b>Results:</b> The test lung model demonstrated consistent comparability in pressures and flows among all devices, except for the WAGS alone, which exhibited discordance through significant overestimation or underestimation. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings indicate that using a WAGS with the AGRS system appeared to be reliable for managing gas evacuation in ICUs without compromising pressure or flow delivery. The data from this experimental trial should be confirmed with clinical studies involving human subjects. Given the increasing use of inhaled sedation in ICUs, these results support the daily application of the WAGS with the AGRS for gas evacuation, similar to its established use in anesthesiology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11662
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anesthetic Gas Scavenging System for Gas Evacuation in the ICU

Mona Assefi, Lucie Collet, Jean‐Michel Constantin
1 citations
Respiratory Care
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
0.69
article

Anesthetic Gas Scavenging System for Gas Evacuation in the ICU

Mona Assefi, Lucie Collet, Jean‐Michel Constantin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Inhaled sedation is increasing in ICUs, with active carbon filters (ACFs) commonly used for evacuating halogenated gases. However, the potential benefits of a waste anesthetic gas system (WAGS) similar to the ones used in operating rooms should be explored. To limit the suction over the flow sensor where the WAGS is connected on ICU ventilators, an anesthetic gas receiving system (AGRS) is required, constituting with the WAGS an active gas receiving and scavenging system (AGRSS). Ensuring that this whole device does not compromise the flow sensor reliability is crucial. The aim of this study was to compare various gas evacuation devices and assess the reliability of AGRSS on ICU ventilators. <b>Methods:</b> In this experimental study, pressures and flows were recorded during the ventilation of a test lung using various ventilator settings and gas evacuation methods: no device (reference condition), ACF, the WAGS alone, AGRSS (WAGS and AGRS together), and the expiratory valve connected to the medical vacuum system with the AGRS in between. Visual comparisons of the pressure and flow curves followed by a statistical analysis comparing median pressures and flows of each device to the reference were performed. <b>Results:</b> The test lung model demonstrated consistent comparability in pressures and flows among all devices, except for the WAGS alone, which exhibited discordance through significant overestimation or underestimation. <b>Conclusions:</b> These findings indicate that using a WAGS with the AGRS system appeared to be reliable for managing gas evacuation in ICUs without compromising pressure or flow delivery. The data from this experimental trial should be confirmed with clinical studies involving human subjects. Given the increasing use of inhaled sedation in ICUs, these results support the daily application of the WAGS with the AGRS for gas evacuation, similar to its established use in anesthesiology.

Respiratory CareVol. 70(3)
Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Groupe de recherche clinique en anesthésie réanimation médecine périopératoire (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.