Proteomic sexing of archaeological cattle remains at Neolithic Kilshane

Although proteomic techniques have been increasingly used to improve our understanding of the human past, few have focussed on the study of tooth enamel for sexing in archaeofaunal remains, despite initial studies over a decade ago investigating human teeth. Here we explore the use of LC-orbitrap-MS/MS for identifying the sex of archaeological domestic cattle remains from the Neolithic enclosure at Kilshane, Ireland (c. 3600 cal. BC), in addition to modern reference materials. Although several individuals could be confidently identified as male, and some less confidently as female, there were also some inconsistencies with predictions based on morphology, albeit such estimations based largely on size. Through comparison with osteometric analyses, the proteomic analyses estimated 14 consistent identifications and six discrepancies, with one of the two speculative males confirmed through the use of proteomics. The male/female proportions for the osteometric analysis based on the metacarpals, the most sexually dimorphic skeletal element, showed that slightly over 50% of the bones were from females and slightly under 50% from males, whereas in the case of proteomics, depending on what level of caution we place on biomarker usage, this is much lower for the identification of males, ranging from 12.5 to 46% (3–11 specimens of 24 successful proteome samples with estimated sex based on their molars). Unexpectedly, our results show evidence of clear differences between modern reference materials and archaeological materials, likely reflecting preservation biases relating to the protein sequences. • Proteomic sexing of domesticated cattle remains from Neolithic enclosure site. • Comparison with morphological sex estimation methods. • Clear differences between ancient and modern enamel proteomes in peptides observed. • Proposed screening criteria relating quality of recovered proteome to ameloblastin relative abundances, in addition to the x-form of amelogenin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Archaeological Science
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2024.106102
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Forensic and Genetic Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proteomic sexing of archaeological cattle remains at Neolithic Kilshane

Andrew C. Kitchener, Michael Buckley, Fabienne Pigière, Manasij Pal Chowdhury et al.
6 citations
Journal of Archaeological Science
Forensic and Genetic Research
3.30
article

Proteomic sexing of archaeological cattle remains at Neolithic Kilshane

Andrew C. Kitchener, Michael Buckley, Fabienne Pigière, Manasij Pal Chowdhury, John Smyth
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Although proteomic techniques have been increasingly used to improve our understanding of the human past, few have focussed on the study of tooth enamel for sexing in archaeofaunal remains, despite initial studies over a decade ago investigating human teeth. Here we explore the use of LC-orbitrap-MS/MS for identifying the sex of archaeological domestic cattle remains from the Neolithic enclosure at Kilshane, Ireland (c. 3600 cal. BC), in addition to modern reference materials. Although several individuals could be confidently identified as male, and some less confidently as female, there were also some inconsistencies with predictions based on morphology, albeit such estimations based largely on size. Through comparison with osteometric analyses, the proteomic analyses estimated 14 consistent identifications and six discrepancies, with one of the two speculative males confirmed through the use of proteomics. The male/female proportions for the osteometric analysis based on the metacarpals, the most sexually dimorphic skeletal element, showed that slightly over 50% of the bones were from females and slightly under 50% from males, whereas in the case of proteomics, depending on what level of caution we place on biomarker usage, this is much lower for the identification of males, ranging from 12.5 to 46% (3–11 specimens of 24 successful proteome samples with estimated sex based on their molars). Unexpectedly, our results show evidence of clear differences between modern reference materials and archaeological materials, likely reflecting preservation biases relating to the protein sequences. • Proteomic sexing of domesticated cattle remains from Neolithic enclosure site. • Comparison with morphological sex estimation methods. • Clear differences between ancient and modern enamel proteomes in peptides observed. • Proposed screening criteria relating quality of recovered proteome to ameloblastin relative abundances, in addition to the x-form of amelogenin.

Journal of Archaeological ScienceVol. 172
University College Dublin (IE), National Museums Scotland (GB), University of Manchester (GB), University of Bristol (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Irish Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Forensic and Genetic Research
3.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.