Comparative Analysis of AR-HUDs Crash Warning Icon Designs: An Eye-Tracking Study Using 360° Panoramic Driving Simulation

Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays (AR-HUDs) enhance driver perception and safety, yet optimal hazard warning design remains unclear. This study examines three AR-HUD crash warning icon types (BD, BR, BW) across various turning scenarios. Using a 360-degree video-based driving simulation with 36 participants, eye-tracking metrics were collected. Results show BW icons, dynamically linked to hazards, significantly improve drivers’ pedestrian risk awareness and visual attention allocation compared to BD and BR systems. BW consistently demonstrated longer gaze duration, higher fixation counts, and shorter time to first fixation across all turns. BD and BR icons were more susceptible to lane changes, potentially diverting attention from hazards. Findings suggest prioritizing dynamic tracking warning icons over fixed-position alternatives to minimize visual competition and distraction, providing crucial insights for AR-HUD optimization in automated vehicles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219167
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of AR-HUDs Crash Warning Icon Designs: An Eye-Tracking Study Using 360° Panoramic Driving Simulation

Xiaoqun Ai, Ying Liang, Zhendong Wu, Guocui Liu
7 citations
Sustainability
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.50
article

Comparative Analysis of AR-HUDs Crash Warning Icon Designs: An Eye-Tracking Study Using 360° Panoramic Driving Simulation

Xiaoqun Ai, Ying Liang, Zhendong Wu, Guocui Liu
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays (AR-HUDs) enhance driver perception and safety, yet optimal hazard warning design remains unclear. This study examines three AR-HUD crash warning icon types (BD, BR, BW) across various turning scenarios. Using a 360-degree video-based driving simulation with 36 participants, eye-tracking metrics were collected. Results show BW icons, dynamically linked to hazards, significantly improve drivers’ pedestrian risk awareness and visual attention allocation compared to BD and BR systems. BW consistently demonstrated longer gaze duration, higher fixation counts, and shorter time to first fixation across all turns. BD and BR icons were more susceptible to lane changes, potentially diverting attention from hazards. Findings suggest prioritizing dynamic tracking warning icons over fixed-position alternatives to minimize visual competition and distraction, providing crucial insights for AR-HUD optimization in automated vehicles.

SustainabilityVol. 16(21)
Huaqiao University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
4.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.