Interdisciplinary Approaches by Polish Orthodontists, Periodontists, and Oral Surgeons to Soft Tissue Augmentation in Adult Patients: A Survey Study

This study evaluates the preferences of dentists regarding the interdisciplinary treatment of patients with gingival recession (GR) and a thin periodontal phenotype, based on their specialization. A cross-sectional study was conducted among Polish dentists, between May and October 2022, using an online survey. The dentists were first asked to provide details regarding their specialization and the length of their professional career. In the second part of the survey, they responded to questions about the preferred timing of a consultation and soft tissue augmentation in patients who planned to undertake orthodontic treatment (OT). Moreover, factors undermining the decision-making process regarding soft tissue augmentation and the methods used for the evaluation of periodontal tissues were assessed. In total, 554 dentists completed the survey, among whom 328 were orthodontists and 226 were periodontists/oral surgeons. A third of the surveyed periodontists/oral surgeons (33%) reported that they receive referrals from orthodontists prior to OT and 39% of orthodontists indicated that they refer patients for soft tissue augmentation before commencing OT. The majority of periodontists/oral surgeons (51%) and the most significant proportion of orthodontists (45%) agreed that the ideal timing of soft tissue augmentation is dependent on each specific case. Both groups of surveyed dentists considered “planned tooth movement” as the most important factor in clinical decision-making. Among the periodontists/oral surgeons, the most popular methods to assess periodontal tissues were: 3D radiological examination, the visual method, and gingival transparency with the use of a periodontal probe. On the other hand, the surveyed orthodontists preferred the visual method, followed by 2D radiological examination, and then by 3D radiological examination. The majority of surveyed periodontists/oral surgeons and orthodontists agreed that the ideal timing of soft tissue augmentation in patients undertaking orthodontic treatment should be decided on a case-by-case basis, with planned tooth movement being the determining factor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219647
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interdisciplinary Approaches by Polish Orthodontists, Periodontists, and Oral Surgeons to Soft Tissue Augmentation in Adult Patients: A Survey Study

Edyta Kalina, Monika Machoy, Bartłomiej Górski
2 citations
Applied Sciences
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
0.80
article

Interdisciplinary Approaches by Polish Orthodontists, Periodontists, and Oral Surgeons to Soft Tissue Augmentation in Adult Patients: A Survey Study

Edyta Kalina, Monika Machoy, Bartłomiej Górski
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the preferences of dentists regarding the interdisciplinary treatment of patients with gingival recession (GR) and a thin periodontal phenotype, based on their specialization. A cross-sectional study was conducted among Polish dentists, between May and October 2022, using an online survey. The dentists were first asked to provide details regarding their specialization and the length of their professional career. In the second part of the survey, they responded to questions about the preferred timing of a consultation and soft tissue augmentation in patients who planned to undertake orthodontic treatment (OT). Moreover, factors undermining the decision-making process regarding soft tissue augmentation and the methods used for the evaluation of periodontal tissues were assessed. In total, 554 dentists completed the survey, among whom 328 were orthodontists and 226 were periodontists/oral surgeons. A third of the surveyed periodontists/oral surgeons (33%) reported that they receive referrals from orthodontists prior to OT and 39% of orthodontists indicated that they refer patients for soft tissue augmentation before commencing OT. The majority of periodontists/oral surgeons (51%) and the most significant proportion of orthodontists (45%) agreed that the ideal timing of soft tissue augmentation is dependent on each specific case. Both groups of surveyed dentists considered “planned tooth movement” as the most important factor in clinical decision-making. Among the periodontists/oral surgeons, the most popular methods to assess periodontal tissues were: 3D radiological examination, the visual method, and gingival transparency with the use of a periodontal probe. On the other hand, the surveyed orthodontists preferred the visual method, followed by 2D radiological examination, and then by 3D radiological examination. The majority of surveyed periodontists/oral surgeons and orthodontists agreed that the ideal timing of soft tissue augmentation in patients undertaking orthodontic treatment should be decided on a case-by-case basis, with planned tooth movement being the determining factor.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(21)
Medical University of Warsaw (PL), Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny, Uniwersytet Warszawski
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.