Sex Differences in Outcomes After Elective and Acute Aortic Surgery—A Single-Centre Experience over the Last Two Decades

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Recent studies show conflicting results regarding sex-related differences in outcomes following aortic surgery. This study primarily evaluated 20-year mortality rates, along with 30-day and one- and five-year rates, and postoperative complications in female and male patients who underwent elective and acute ascending aortic surgery at a tertiary care centre. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study analysed data from 676 adult patients who underwent ascending aortic surgery in Amsterdam UMC, between January 2001 and December 2020. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's Exact test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and logistic regression were used to assess differences in mortality rates. <b>Results:</b> Patient characteristics for elective and acute procedures were different. Females were generally older (elective: 69 vs. 62 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001, acute: 70 vs. 62 years, <i>p</i> = 0.002), with smaller body surface area (elective/acute: 1.8 vs. 2.1 m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower preoperative haemoglobin (elective: 8.3 vs. 8.9 mmol/L, <i>p</i> < 0.001, acute: 7.8 vs. 8.4 mmol/L, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (elective: 64 vs. 91 mL/min, <i>p</i> < 0.001; acute: 67 vs. 83 mL/min, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Females undergoing elective procedures had a lower body mass index (25.0 vs. 26.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.006), better left ventricle function (<i>p</i> = 0.048) and higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15 vs. 8%, <i>p</i> = 0.032). In elective procedures, the 20-year mortality rate (49% vs. 30%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was significantly higher in females, especially those under 60 years (OR of 3.158 [1.2-8.6], <i>p</i> = 0.024). Mortality rates up to one year were comparable. Five-year mortality rate (26% vs. 16%, <i>p</i> = 0.027) was higher. Females had longer ventilation times (32% vs. 15%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and intensive care unit stays (2 vs. 1 days, <i>p</i> = 0.005). For acute procedures, morbidity and mortality rates were comparable between sexes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Females under 60, undergoing elective ascending aortic surgery showed higher long-term all-cause mortality rates. Implementing sex-specific management strategies and extended follow-up could be essential for improving outcomes in this group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13216313
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Outcomes After Elective and Acute Aortic Surgery—A Single-Centre Experience over the Last Two Decades

Magnus Strypet, Caitlin Bozic, Susanne Eberl, Floor J. Mansvelder et al.
4 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
1.68
article

Sex Differences in Outcomes After Elective and Acute Aortic Surgery—A Single-Centre Experience over the Last Two Decades

Magnus Strypet, Caitlin Bozic, Susanne Eberl, Floor J. Mansvelder, Jennifer S. Breel, Eline S. de Klerk, Henning Hermanns, Desiré E. López González, Evert K. Jansen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Recent studies show conflicting results regarding sex-related differences in outcomes following aortic surgery. This study primarily evaluated 20-year mortality rates, along with 30-day and one- and five-year rates, and postoperative complications in female and male patients who underwent elective and acute ascending aortic surgery at a tertiary care centre. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective observational study analysed data from 676 adult patients who underwent ascending aortic surgery in Amsterdam UMC, between January 2001 and December 2020. Descriptive statistics, Fisher's Exact test, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and logistic regression were used to assess differences in mortality rates. <b>Results:</b> Patient characteristics for elective and acute procedures were different. Females were generally older (elective: 69 vs. 62 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001, acute: 70 vs. 62 years, <i>p</i> = 0.002), with smaller body surface area (elective/acute: 1.8 vs. 2.1 m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower preoperative haemoglobin (elective: 8.3 vs. 8.9 mmol/L, <i>p</i> < 0.001, acute: 7.8 vs. 8.4 mmol/L, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (elective: 64 vs. 91 mL/min, <i>p</i> < 0.001; acute: 67 vs. 83 mL/min, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Females undergoing elective procedures had a lower body mass index (25.0 vs. 26.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 0.006), better left ventricle function (<i>p</i> = 0.048) and higher incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (15 vs. 8%, <i>p</i> = 0.032). In elective procedures, the 20-year mortality rate (49% vs. 30%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was significantly higher in females, especially those under 60 years (OR of 3.158 [1.2-8.6], <i>p</i> = 0.024). Mortality rates up to one year were comparable. Five-year mortality rate (26% vs. 16%, <i>p</i> = 0.027) was higher. Females had longer ventilation times (32% vs. 15%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and intensive care unit stays (2 vs. 1 days, <i>p</i> = 0.005). For acute procedures, morbidity and mortality rates were comparable between sexes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Females under 60, undergoing elective ascending aortic surgery showed higher long-term all-cause mortality rates. Implementing sex-specific management strategies and extended follow-up could be essential for improving outcomes in this group.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(21)
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.