Starshade exoplanet data challenge: what we learned

Starshade is one of the technologies that will enable the observation and characterization of small planets around nearby stars through direct imaging. Extensive models have been developed to describe a starshade’s optical performance and noise budget in exoplanet imaging. The Starshade Exoplanet Data Challenge was designed to validate this noise budget and evaluate the capabilities of image-processing techniques by inviting community participating teams to analyze >1000 simulated images of hypothetical exoplanetary systems observed through a starshade. Because the starshade would suppress the starlight so well, the dominant noise source remaining in the images becomes the exozodiacal disks and their structures. We summarize the techniques used by the participating teams and compare their findings with the truth. With an independent component analysis to remove the background, ∼70% of the inner planets (close to the inner working angle) have been detected along with ∼30% of the outer planets. Planet detection becomes more difficult in the cases of higher disk inclination as the false negative and false positive counts increase. Interestingly, we found little difference in the planet detection rate between 10−10 and 10−9 instrument contrast, confirming that the dominant limitations are from the astrophysical background and not the performance of the starshade. A non-parametric background calibration scheme, such as the independent component analysis reported here, results in a mean residual of 10% the background brightness. This background estimation error leads to substantial false positives and negatives and systematic bias in the planet flux estimation and should be included in the estimation of the planet detection signal-to-noise ratio for imaging using a starshade and also a coronagraph that delivers exozodi-limited imaging. These results corroborate the starshade noise budget and provide new insight into background calibration that will be useful for anticipating the science capabilities of future high-contrast imaging space missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jatis.10.4.048001
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Starshade exoplanet data challenge: what we learned

J. Carson, Mario Damiano, Doug Lisman, Aly Nida et al.
2 citations
Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
1.01
article

Starshade exoplanet data challenge: what we learned

J. Carson, Mario Damiano, Doug Lisman, Aly Nida, Renyu Hu, Angelle Tanner, S. R. Hildebrandt, Stuart Shaklan, Brian Dunne
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Starshade is one of the technologies that will enable the observation and characterization of small planets around nearby stars through direct imaging. Extensive models have been developed to describe a starshade’s optical performance and noise budget in exoplanet imaging. The Starshade Exoplanet Data Challenge was designed to validate this noise budget and evaluate the capabilities of image-processing techniques by inviting community participating teams to analyze >1000 simulated images of hypothetical exoplanetary systems observed through a starshade. Because the starshade would suppress the starlight so well, the dominant noise source remaining in the images becomes the exozodiacal disks and their structures. We summarize the techniques used by the participating teams and compare their findings with the truth. With an independent component analysis to remove the background, ∼70% of the inner planets (close to the inner working angle) have been detected along with ∼30% of the outer planets. Planet detection becomes more difficult in the cases of higher disk inclination as the false negative and false positive counts increase. Interestingly, we found little difference in the planet detection rate between 10−10 and 10−9 instrument contrast, confirming that the dominant limitations are from the astrophysical background and not the performance of the starshade. A non-parametric background calibration scheme, such as the independent component analysis reported here, results in a mean residual of 10% the background brightness. This background estimation error leads to substantial false positives and negatives and systematic bias in the planet flux estimation and should be included in the estimation of the planet detection signal-to-noise ratio for imaging using a starshade and also a coronagraph that delivers exozodi-limited imaging. These results corroborate the starshade noise budget and provide new insight into background calibration that will be useful for anticipating the science capabilities of future high-contrast imaging space missions.

Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and SystemsVol. 10(04)
California Institute of Technology (US), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), College of Charleston (US), Mississippi State University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.