Modelos de evaluación del desempeño laboral: Una revisión sistemática de literatura.

The quality and success of an organization are inherently linked to employee performance, making periodic performance evaluation essential. This article analyzes the most commonly used existing models of performance evaluation at the organizational level. Traditional performance evaluation models, such as competency assessment, 360-degree feedback, and critical incident evaluation, have advantages and disadvantages. For example, competency assessment allows measuring skills and behaviors, while 360-degree feedback offers a comprehensive view by considering multiple perspectives. However, many performance evaluation models are affected by biases and subjectivity in results, requiring a significant investment of time and resources. On the other hand, artificial intelligence is transforming the landscape of performance evaluation. Technological advances enable the development of more objective and efficient systems for assessing employee performance. Additionally, artificial intelligence can analyze large volumes of data to identify trends and patterns in performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Gestión de las Personas y Tecnología
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35588/0g6zzr18
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Stress and Burnout Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelos de evaluación del desempeño laboral: Una revisión sistemática de literatura.

Milton F. Barragán-Landy, Rodrigo Saúl Jerves Mora, Patricia Abigail Calle-Quezada
2 citations
Revista Gestión de las Personas y Tecnología
Stress and Burnout Research
1.29
article

Modelos de evaluación del desempeño laboral: Una revisión sistemática de literatura.

Milton F. Barragán-Landy, Rodrigo Saúl Jerves Mora, Patricia Abigail Calle-Quezada
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The quality and success of an organization are inherently linked to employee performance, making periodic performance evaluation essential. This article analyzes the most commonly used existing models of performance evaluation at the organizational level. Traditional performance evaluation models, such as competency assessment, 360-degree feedback, and critical incident evaluation, have advantages and disadvantages. For example, competency assessment allows measuring skills and behaviors, while 360-degree feedback offers a comprehensive view by considering multiple perspectives. However, many performance evaluation models are affected by biases and subjectivity in results, requiring a significant investment of time and resources. On the other hand, artificial intelligence is transforming the landscape of performance evaluation. Technological advances enable the development of more objective and efficient systems for assessing employee performance. Additionally, artificial intelligence can analyze large volumes of data to identify trends and patterns in performance.

Revista Gestión de las Personas y TecnologíaVol. 17(50)
Peruvian University of Applied Sciences (PE), University of Cuenca (EC)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Stress and Burnout Research
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.