Comparative efficacy of Biogents Sentinel and CDC traps for Aedes and Culex mosquito surveillance in India
Abstract Background Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are important arthropod vectors that are responsible for transmitting numerous pathogens of major diseases. Adult mosquito traps help in effective surveillance. In this study, we compared the efficacy of the Biogents® Sentinel (BGS) traps and CO 2 -baited CDC traps for adult mosquito collection within four sites in India. Results We found that BGS traps collected significantly more Culex quinquefasciatus and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes (85.8% of the total catch) than CDC traps (14.9% of the total catch). We also conducted a follow-up experiment to study the effect of adding CO 2 as bait along with the BG lure to determine if it increases the number of mosquitoes collected. The results showed that BGS traps with BG lure + CO 2 collected significantly more mosquitoes (69.5% of the total catch) than BGS traps with BG lure only (30.5% of the total catch). Although BGS traps were developed for surveillance of Ae. albopictus (Skuse) and Ae. aegypti (L.), the traps collected more Cx. quinquefasciatus (Say.) than any other mosquito species. Conclusion BGS trap is an efficient surveillance tool, and it can be used as part of an integrated mosquito management program by public health officials in order to combat mosquito-borne diseases.
Authors
- Munusamy Rajiv Gandhi
- S. Ignacimuthu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8467-789X)
- Appadurai Daniel Reegan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9824-1501)
- Banugopan Kesavaraju
- M Balachandar
- Ary Farajollahi
Institutions
- National Center for Disease Control (IN)
- Manonmaniam Sundaranar University (IN)
- University of Madras (IN)
- Mercer County Mosquito Control (US)
- St Xavier’s College (IN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology
- Published
- 2024-10-22
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-024-00402-9
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.17