Analysis Of Traffic Sign Recognition Using Artificial Neural Network Algorithm Compared With Accuracy Of Recurrent Neural Networks

The purpose of this work is to improve Traffic sign recognition using machine learning to improve comprehension of traffic signs. The Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) method is compared with Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) to find accuracy. Symbols on the traffic sign boards are used as an image processing input picture. Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) (Group 1) has ten samples and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) (Group 2) has ten samples and in total 146 samples. With the help of image analysis, a Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) are used to predict the accuracy of traffic sign recognition. The training and testing splits are varied for each network type. The G Power test used is about $85 \%$ with clincalc.com the process is done for $\alpha=0.05$ and $\mathrm{N}=0.85$ iterations. Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) (90.585 %) has the increased accuracy over Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) ($\mathbf{7 6. 6 4 9}$ %) with a statistical significance value of $\mathbf{0. 0 4 2}$ (p <0.05). Accuracy of Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is significantly better, when compared to accuracy of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-08-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/atigb63471.2024.10717662
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Vehicle License Plate Recognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis Of Traffic Sign Recognition Using Artificial Neural Network Algorithm Compared With Accuracy Of Recurrent Neural Networks

P. G. Kubendran Amos, Mahesh Keerthivasan, S. Narendran
3 citations
Vehicle License Plate Recognition
0.96
article

Analysis Of Traffic Sign Recognition Using Artificial Neural Network Algorithm Compared With Accuracy Of Recurrent Neural Networks

P. G. Kubendran Amos, Mahesh Keerthivasan, S. Narendran
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to improve Traffic sign recognition using machine learning to improve comprehension of traffic signs. The Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) method is compared with Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) to find accuracy. Symbols on the traffic sign boards are used as an image processing input picture. Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) (Group 1) has ten samples and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) (Group 2) has ten samples and in total 146 samples. With the help of image analysis, a Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) are used to predict the accuracy of traffic sign recognition. The training and testing splits are varied for each network type. The G Power test used is about $85 \%$ with clincalc.com the process is done for $\alpha=0.05$ and $\mathrm{N}=0.85$ iterations. Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) (90.585 %) has the increased accuracy over Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) ($\mathbf{7 6. 6 4 9}$ %) with a statistical significance value of $\mathbf{0. 0 4 2}$ (p <0.05). Accuracy of Novel Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is significantly better, when compared to accuracy of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN).

Saveetha University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Vehicle License Plate Recognition
0.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis Of Traffic Sign Recognition Using Artificial Neural Network Algorithm Compared With Accuracy Of Recurrent Neural Networks — P. G. Kubendran Amos, Mahesh Keerthivasan, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS