CH<sub>4</sub> and CO emission estimates for megacities: deriving enhancement ratios of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and CO from GOSAT-2 observations

Abstract Enhancement ratios among trace gases co-emitted by combustion of fossil fuels vary with emission sources and their combustion efficiency. We used column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of carbon dioxide (XCO 2 ), methane (XCH 4 ), and carbon monoxide (XCO) from the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite-2 (GOSAT-2), a unique satellite that observes them simultaneously with the same field of view, to derive the enhancement ratios (ΔXCO/ΔXCO 2 , ΔXCO/ΔXCH 4 , and ΔXCH 4 /ΔXCO 2 ) for the 40 most populous cities in the world. These enhancement ratios were used to evaluate the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). For cities where the difference in the 2015 EDGAR CO emissions between the latest versions (v6.1 and v5.0) was 30% or less, the GOSAT-2 ΔXCO/ΔXCO 2 ratios and EDGAR (v6.1/v7.0) CO/CO 2 emission ratios were in good agreement (correlation coefficient of 0.65). For ∼70% of the cities where the difference of CO emissions exceeded 30%, the EDGAR CO/CO 2 emission ratios using v6.1 CO emissions were in better agreement with the GOSAT-2 ΔXCO/ΔXCO 2 ratios than those using v5.0 CO emissions, indicating that v6.1 CO emissions were improved over v5.0 emissions. However, for the remaining cities, the version upgrade may have reduced the CO emissions too much. The CH 4 and CO emissions for each city were then estimated from the ΔXCH 4 /ΔXCO 2 and ΔXCO/ΔXCO 2 ratios, respectively, by reference to the CO 2 emissions from the Open-data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO 2 (ODIAC) or EDGAR. Compared to our estimates using the ODIAC (EDGAR) CO 2 emissions, the EDGAR v7.0 CH 4 and v6.1 CO emissions were underestimated for 74% (57%) and 76% (53%), respectively, of all cities where results were available. For several cities where emissions were estimated using in situ observations and ground-based remote sensing observations, our results were in reasonable agreement with these results. The implication is that satellite-derived enhancement ratios can provide informative constraints on anthropogenic emissions in megacities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad89e0
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.98

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CH4 and CO emission estimates for megacities: deriving enhancement ratios of CO2, CH4, and CO from GOSAT-2 observations

Yukio Yoshida, Hirofumi Ohyama, Tsuneo Matsunaga
7 citations
Environmental Research Letters
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.98
article

CH4 and CO emission estimates for megacities: deriving enhancement ratios of CO2, CH4, and CO from GOSAT-2 observations

Yukio Yoshida, Hirofumi Ohyama, Tsuneo Matsunaga
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Enhancement ratios among trace gases co-emitted by combustion of fossil fuels vary with emission sources and their combustion efficiency. We used column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of carbon dioxide (XCO 2 ), methane (XCH 4 ), and carbon monoxide (XCO) from the Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite-2 (GOSAT-2), a unique satellite that observes them simultaneously with the same field of view, to derive the enhancement ratios (ΔXCO/ΔXCO 2 , ΔXCO/ΔXCH 4 , and ΔXCH 4 /ΔXCO 2 ) for the 40 most populous cities in the world. These enhancement ratios were used to evaluate the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR). For cities where the difference in the 2015 EDGAR CO emissions between the latest versions (v6.1 and v5.0) was 30% or less, the GOSAT-2 ΔXCO/ΔXCO 2 ratios and EDGAR (v6.1/v7.0) CO/CO 2 emission ratios were in good agreement (correlation coefficient of 0.65). For ∼70% of the cities where the difference of CO emissions exceeded 30%, the EDGAR CO/CO 2 emission ratios using v6.1 CO emissions were in better agreement with the GOSAT-2 ΔXCO/ΔXCO 2 ratios than those using v5.0 CO emissions, indicating that v6.1 CO emissions were improved over v5.0 emissions. However, for the remaining cities, the version upgrade may have reduced the CO emissions too much. The CH 4 and CO emissions for each city were then estimated from the ΔXCH 4 /ΔXCO 2 and ΔXCO/ΔXCO 2 ratios, respectively, by reference to the CO 2 emissions from the Open-data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO 2 (ODIAC) or EDGAR. Compared to our estimates using the ODIAC (EDGAR) CO 2 emissions, the EDGAR v7.0 CH 4 and v6.1 CO emissions were underestimated for 74% (57%) and 76% (53%), respectively, of all cities where results were available. For several cities where emissions were estimated using in situ observations and ground-based remote sensing observations, our results were in reasonable agreement with these results. The implication is that satellite-derived enhancement ratios can provide informative constraints on anthropogenic emissions in megacities.

Environmental Research LettersVol. 19(12)
National Institute for Environmental Studies (JP)
Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
1.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.