Multimodal transport route selection: An integrated fuzzy hierarchy risk assessment and multiple criteria decision-making approach

• The proposed approach integrates fuzzy hierarchy risk assessment and MCDM methods. • Risk magnitudes are precisely calculated based on hierarchical relation structure. • Conflicting decision-making data are synthesized to make the best compromise solution. • The case study demonstrates the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Selecting multimodal transport routes is a complex problem due to the presence of various, often conflicting decision-making attributes, such as transportation cost and time, diverse risks with hierarchical relationships both within and across groups, decision-makers’ preferences, and numerous possible options. To address this problem, a novel decision-making approach is proposed, integrating the best-worst method (BWM), fuzzy hierarchy risk assessment (FHRA), and additive ratio assessment (ARAS). This approach decomposes the route decision-making problem into a hierarchy structure and determines the optimal solution through three distinct phases. In the first phase, BWM assigns relative weights to various criteria within the hierarchical structure, ensuring that the decision-makers’ preferences are accurately reflected. In the second phase, FHRA evaluates qualitative risks from the lowest to the highest hierarchy levels. This process involves calculating risk magnitudes at the lowest hierarchy level and progressively recalculating them as they ascend to the highest level of the hierarchy. The multimodal transport cost-model provides transportation cost and time. In the final phase, ARAS synthesizes all the decision-making data to rank all possible multimodal alternative routes based on utility scores. The realistic case study validates the practical applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach. The findings indicated that the proposed methodology effectively identify the most appropriate multimodal transport route as the best compromise choice. This study contributes new knowledge regarding a new hybrid decision-making framework that combines multiple criteria decision-making methods with fuzzy hierarchy risk analysis, thereby enhancing the design of transportation plans to align with organizational goals and customer requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2024.101252
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.90
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal transport route selection: An integrated fuzzy hierarchy risk assessment and multiple criteria decision-making approach

Warapoj Meethom, Wasana Chankham, Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit
10 citations
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
4.90
article

Multimodal transport route selection: An integrated fuzzy hierarchy risk assessment and multiple criteria decision-making approach

Warapoj Meethom, Wasana Chankham, Nitidetch Koohathongsumrit
article en
10 citations

Abstract

• The proposed approach integrates fuzzy hierarchy risk assessment and MCDM methods. • Risk magnitudes are precisely calculated based on hierarchical relation structure. • Conflicting decision-making data are synthesized to make the best compromise solution. • The case study demonstrates the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Selecting multimodal transport routes is a complex problem due to the presence of various, often conflicting decision-making attributes, such as transportation cost and time, diverse risks with hierarchical relationships both within and across groups, decision-makers’ preferences, and numerous possible options. To address this problem, a novel decision-making approach is proposed, integrating the best-worst method (BWM), fuzzy hierarchy risk assessment (FHRA), and additive ratio assessment (ARAS). This approach decomposes the route decision-making problem into a hierarchy structure and determines the optimal solution through three distinct phases. In the first phase, BWM assigns relative weights to various criteria within the hierarchical structure, ensuring that the decision-makers’ preferences are accurately reflected. In the second phase, FHRA evaluates qualitative risks from the lowest to the highest hierarchy levels. This process involves calculating risk magnitudes at the lowest hierarchy level and progressively recalculating them as they ascend to the highest level of the hierarchy. The multimodal transport cost-model provides transportation cost and time. In the final phase, ARAS synthesizes all the decision-making data to rank all possible multimodal alternative routes based on utility scores. The realistic case study validates the practical applicability and effectiveness of the proposed approach. The findings indicated that the proposed methodology effectively identify the most appropriate multimodal transport route as the best compromise choice. This study contributes new knowledge regarding a new hybrid decision-making framework that combines multiple criteria decision-making methods with fuzzy hierarchy risk analysis, thereby enhancing the design of transportation plans to align with organizational goals and customer requirements.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 28
Ramkhamhaeng University (TH), King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok (TH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
4.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.