The comparative study between treatment with Cryoprecipitate and recombinant Factor VIII in Hemophilia in children

Introduction: Hemophilia A is a genetic disorder caused by a deficiency or absence of coagulation Factor VIII, leading to impaired blood clotting and prolonged bleeding, especially into joints and muscles. Without appropriate treatment, recurrent bleeding can result in chronic joint damage and disability. Traditionally, Cryoprecipitate, a blood product containing concentrated clotting factors, has been used to manage bleeding episodes in patients with Hemophilia A. However, with advancements in biotechnology, recombinant Factor VIII, a synthetic product, has become an alternative. Recombinant Factor VIII eliminates the risks associated with blood-derived products, such as viral transmission, and offers more consistent dosing and availability. Despite these advantages, recombinant therapies are significantly more expensive. This study seeks to compare the clinical efficacy, safety of Cryoprecipitate versus recombinant Factor VIII in pediatric patients with Hemophilia A, providing critical insights for optimal management strategies. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes, safety of Cryoprecipitate versus recombinant Factor VIII in the management of children diagnosed with Hemophilia A. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 32 pediatric patients diagnosed with Hemophilia A, treated either with Cryoprecipitate or recombinant Factor VIII. Clinical data were collected on bleeding frequency, Factor VIII recovery. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine significant differences between the two groups. Results: The study demonstrated that treatment with recombinant Factor VIII resulted in significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to Cryoprecipitate. In the group treated with recombinant Factor VIII, patients required scheduled hospitalizations for routine follow-up and management, with no reports of acute bleeding episodes during these admissions. This contrasts sharply with the Cryoprecipitate group, where all hospitalizations were precipitated by acute bleeding events, necessitating urgent intervention. Conclusions: Recombinant Factor VIII demonstrates superior efficacy in managing Hemophilia A in children compared to Cryoprecipitate. Recombinant therapy provides better clinical outcomes, justifying its use in modern treatment protocols.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.20.1.0793
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The comparative study between treatment with Cryoprecipitate and recombinant Factor VIII in Hemophilia in children

Dorina Agachi, Valentin Țurea, Galina Eșanu
World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

The comparative study between treatment with Cryoprecipitate and recombinant Factor VIII in Hemophilia in children

Dorina Agachi, Valentin Țurea, Galina Eșanu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Hemophilia A is a genetic disorder caused by a deficiency or absence of coagulation Factor VIII, leading to impaired blood clotting and prolonged bleeding, especially into joints and muscles. Without appropriate treatment, recurrent bleeding can result in chronic joint damage and disability. Traditionally, Cryoprecipitate, a blood product containing concentrated clotting factors, has been used to manage bleeding episodes in patients with Hemophilia A. However, with advancements in biotechnology, recombinant Factor VIII, a synthetic product, has become an alternative. Recombinant Factor VIII eliminates the risks associated with blood-derived products, such as viral transmission, and offers more consistent dosing and availability. Despite these advantages, recombinant therapies are significantly more expensive. This study seeks to compare the clinical efficacy, safety of Cryoprecipitate versus recombinant Factor VIII in pediatric patients with Hemophilia A, providing critical insights for optimal management strategies. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes, safety of Cryoprecipitate versus recombinant Factor VIII in the management of children diagnosed with Hemophilia A. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 32 pediatric patients diagnosed with Hemophilia A, treated either with Cryoprecipitate or recombinant Factor VIII. Clinical data were collected on bleeding frequency, Factor VIII recovery. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine significant differences between the two groups. Results: The study demonstrated that treatment with recombinant Factor VIII resulted in significantly improved clinical outcomes compared to Cryoprecipitate. In the group treated with recombinant Factor VIII, patients required scheduled hospitalizations for routine follow-up and management, with no reports of acute bleeding episodes during these admissions. This contrasts sharply with the Cryoprecipitate group, where all hospitalizations were precipitated by acute bleeding events, necessitating urgent intervention. Conclusions: Recombinant Factor VIII demonstrates superior efficacy in managing Hemophilia A in children compared to Cryoprecipitate. Recombinant therapy provides better clinical outcomes, justifying its use in modern treatment protocols.

World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health SciencesVol. 20(1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.