Research on Judicial Application of Custom as Source of Civil Law

Article 10 of the Civil Code stipulates that when resolving civil disputes, if there is no legal provision that can be applied, customs can be used, but only if they are consistent with public order and morality. This provision confirms the legal source status of customs, which is beneficial to completing the legal sources of civil law, maintaining the openness of civil law, and preventing the vacuum of civil rights remedies. It is also beneficial to limiting the discretionary power of judges and upholding judicial justice. When there is no legal reference, customs can also serve as the basis for judging cases. However, there are still problems with the judicial application of customs, such as difficulties for parties to provide evidence, unequal treatment of similar cases, and vague expression of the application of civil customs in judicial documents. Specific measures for improvement can be taken from the perspectives of strengthening the investigation and collection of customs, optimizing the burden of proof for civil customs, and establishing relevant case guidance systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2024-09-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/2k7ejf82
Primary Topic
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Judicial Application of Custom as Source of Civil Law

G.B. Liu T. Liu J. Zhang
Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
article

Research on Judicial Application of Custom as Source of Civil Law

G.B. Liu T. Liu J. Zhang
article en

Abstract

Article 10 of the Civil Code stipulates that when resolving civil disputes, if there is no legal provision that can be applied, customs can be used, but only if they are consistent with public order and morality. This provision confirms the legal source status of customs, which is beneficial to completing the legal sources of civil law, maintaining the openness of civil law, and preventing the vacuum of civil rights remedies. It is also beneficial to limiting the discretionary power of judges and upholding judicial justice. When there is no legal reference, customs can also serve as the basis for judging cases. However, there are still problems with the judicial application of customs, such as difficulties for parties to provide evidence, unequal treatment of similar cases, and vague expression of the application of civil customs in judicial documents. Specific measures for improvement can be taken from the perspectives of strengthening the investigation and collection of customs, optimizing the burden of proof for civil customs, and establishing relevant case guidance systems.

Frontiers in Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 4(9)
Anhui University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on Judicial Application of Custom as Source of Civil Law — G.B. Liu T. Liu J. Zhang · Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS