Foreign Approaches to Protecting Business Reputation of Legal Entities

The paper is devoted the problem of protecting the business reputation of legal entities in Russia and in foreign countries. The author elucidates various approaches to the definition and protection of business reputation and the possibility of compensation for moral harm caused to legal entities. The paper provides examples from the legislation and judicial practice of various countries, including Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Brazil and China. The legislation of the EAEU and BRICS member states differs in approaches to protecting the business reputation of legal entities. In some countries, such as Armenia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, legal entities are not granted the right to compensation for moral damage, but they can demand refutation of defamatory information and compensation for damages. In Kyrgyzstan and Brazil, legal entities can claim compensation for moral damage. In China, the reputation of legal entities is protected on an equal basis with individuals, while taking into account public interests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lex Russica
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2024.215.10.018-027
Primary Topic
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foreign Approaches to Protecting Business Reputation of Legal Entities

V. V. Zaitsev
Lex Russica
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
article

Foreign Approaches to Protecting Business Reputation of Legal Entities

V. V. Zaitsev
article en

Abstract

The paper is devoted the problem of protecting the business reputation of legal entities in Russia and in foreign countries. The author elucidates various approaches to the definition and protection of business reputation and the possibility of compensation for moral harm caused to legal entities. The paper provides examples from the legislation and judicial practice of various countries, including Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Brazil and China. The legislation of the EAEU and BRICS member states differs in approaches to protecting the business reputation of legal entities. In some countries, such as Armenia, Belarus and Kazakhstan, legal entities are not granted the right to compensation for moral damage, but they can demand refutation of defamatory information and compensation for damages. In Kyrgyzstan and Brazil, legal entities can claim compensation for moral damage. In China, the reputation of legal entities is protected on an equal basis with individuals, while taking into account public interests.

Lex RussicaVol. 77(10)
The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.