BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF INTERSPINOUS DEVICE, MIDFIX IN DESTABILIZED SPINE

Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability and loosening of the Midfix device under complex cyclic loading with the resection of interspinous and supraspinous ligaments.Materials and Methods: A biomechanical study of motion analysis and cyclic loading on six fresh-frozen lamb spines was conducted.Specimens were divided into three groups: control, destabilized, and midfix groups.The excision of interspinous and supraspinous ligaments was performed in the destabilized and Midfix groups.Axial loads of 400 N were applied to the spine, and an increased moment of up to 8400 N-mm was generated through the axial movement to achieve the flexion-extension (FE) and right-left bending (LB) motions.During testing, the extensometer recorded the intervertebral displacement at decompression levels L4-5.According to the analysis, the value for which p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Implantation of the ISD (Interspinous Device) to strengthen segment stabilization resulted in a significant decrease in the range of motion of 43.2% in extension, 57.8% in flexion, and 25.6% in LB, yet an increase in right bending by 25.6%.A comparison between the intact spine and Midfix groups revealed significant differences in the range of motion in FE and LB.However, there were no statistically significant differences in right bending. Conclusion:The Midfix device stabilized the segments after resecting the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments.In addition, Midfix was more effective in flexion and extension than the other loading modes.Therefore, the lack of a stabilizing effect in bending should be carefully considered.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/jtss.galenos.2024.14632
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF INTERSPINOUS DEVICE, MIDFIX IN DESTABILIZED SPINE

Ertuğrul Şahin, Sang‐Ha Shin, Fatih Ertem, Sang-Ho Lee et al.
Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF INTERSPINOUS DEVICE, MIDFIX IN DESTABILIZED SPINE

Ertuğrul Şahin, Sang‐Ha Shin, Fatih Ertem, Sang-Ho Lee, Junseok Bae, Ahmet Karakaşlı
article en

Abstract

Objective:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability and loosening of the Midfix device under complex cyclic loading with the resection of interspinous and supraspinous ligaments.Materials and Methods: A biomechanical study of motion analysis and cyclic loading on six fresh-frozen lamb spines was conducted.Specimens were divided into three groups: control, destabilized, and midfix groups.The excision of interspinous and supraspinous ligaments was performed in the destabilized and Midfix groups.Axial loads of 400 N were applied to the spine, and an increased moment of up to 8400 N-mm was generated through the axial movement to achieve the flexion-extension (FE) and right-left bending (LB) motions.During testing, the extensometer recorded the intervertebral displacement at decompression levels L4-5.According to the analysis, the value for which p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: Implantation of the ISD (Interspinous Device) to strengthen segment stabilization resulted in a significant decrease in the range of motion of 43.2% in extension, 57.8% in flexion, and 25.6% in LB, yet an increase in right bending by 25.6%.A comparison between the intact spine and Midfix groups revealed significant differences in the range of motion in FE and LB.However, there were no statistically significant differences in right bending. Conclusion:The Midfix device stabilized the segments after resecting the interspinous and supraspinous ligaments.In addition, Midfix was more effective in flexion and extension than the other loading modes.Therefore, the lack of a stabilizing effect in bending should be carefully considered.

Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF INTERSPINOUS DEVICE, MIDFIX IN DESTABILIZED SPINE — Ertuğrul Şahin, Sang‐Ha Shin, et al. · Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS