Prey nutrient content is associated with the trophic interactions of spiders and their prey selection under field conditions

Consumers are thought to select food resources based on their nutritional content. While laboratory experiments have explored this, the nutritional dynamics of invertebrate predators have been scarcely studied in the field given various methodological constraints. The intersection of these nutritional dynamics with predator traits is also poorly characterised, leading to many gaps in our understanding of how different predators forage and feed in natural systems. Here, we integrate dietary metabarcoding with prey macronutrient (protein, lipid and carbohydrate) content and abundance to assess how nutrients and predator traits (sex, life stage and taxonomy) interactively drive prey preferences in the field, using spider–prey interactions as a model system. Different spider genera, sexes and life stages had nutritionally distinct diets. Our analyses demonstrated disproportionate foraging (selection and avoidance) for prey rich in different macronutrients, with the nature of these relationships differing between spider taxa, life stages and sexes. This may be explained by niche differentiation among spider groups, driven by biases toward prey rich in different nutrients, or nutrient‐specific foraging in which individual spiders vary their nutritional preferences to redress deficits, although further evidence is required to confirm this. This insight into the nutritional dynamics of generalist invertebrate predators extends our understanding beyond lab‐based behavioural assays and provides a novel framework for other complex real‐world systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oikos
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.10712
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Genetic diversity and population structure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prey nutrient content is associated with the trophic interactions of spiders and their prey selection under field conditions

Maximillian P. T. G. Tercel, Carsten T. Müller, Pablo Orozco‐terWengel, Jordan P. Cuff et al.
7 citations
Oikos
Genetic diversity and population structure
3.85
article

Prey nutrient content is associated with the trophic interactions of spiders and their prey selection under field conditions

Maximillian P. T. G. Tercel, Carsten T. Müller, Pablo Orozco‐terWengel, Jordan P. Cuff, William O. C. Symondson, Shawn M. Wilder, Lorna E. Drake, James R. Bell, Ian P. Vaughan
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Consumers are thought to select food resources based on their nutritional content. While laboratory experiments have explored this, the nutritional dynamics of invertebrate predators have been scarcely studied in the field given various methodological constraints. The intersection of these nutritional dynamics with predator traits is also poorly characterised, leading to many gaps in our understanding of how different predators forage and feed in natural systems. Here, we integrate dietary metabarcoding with prey macronutrient (protein, lipid and carbohydrate) content and abundance to assess how nutrients and predator traits (sex, life stage and taxonomy) interactively drive prey preferences in the field, using spider–prey interactions as a model system. Different spider genera, sexes and life stages had nutritionally distinct diets. Our analyses demonstrated disproportionate foraging (selection and avoidance) for prey rich in different macronutrients, with the nature of these relationships differing between spider taxa, life stages and sexes. This may be explained by niche differentiation among spider groups, driven by biases toward prey rich in different nutrients, or nutrient‐specific foraging in which individual spiders vary their nutritional preferences to redress deficits, although further evidence is required to confirm this. This insight into the nutritional dynamics of generalist invertebrate predators extends our understanding beyond lab‐based behavioural assays and provides a novel framework for other complex real‐world systems.

OikosVol. 2025(2)
Oklahoma State University (US), Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust (JE), Rothamsted Research (GB), Cardiff University (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
National Science Foundation, Directorate for Biological Sciences, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genetic diversity and population structure
3.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.