Has the real rate of return “depreciated”?

Abstract The average depreciation rate in the United States has increased since the 1970s, a pattern most likely matched in other advanced economies. We argue that a higher depreciation rate has reduced the risk-free interest rate. We do so in a quantitative overlapping-generations model which allows for risk-premia and market power. We show that the importance of the rate of depreciation on the risk-free interest rate depends crucially on the elasticity of intertemporal substitution as well as the size of market power. Our calibrated model shows that higher depreciation plausibly reduced the risk-free rate by 30 basis points over the past half century. We contrast our results with models using a representative-agent framework (Farhi and Gourio in Accounting for macro-finance trends: market power, intangibles, and risk premia. Brookings papers on economic activity, 147, 2019) which typically do not find a role for the rate of depreciation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Growth
Published
2024-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-024-09248-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Has the real rate of return “depreciated”?

Carl‐Johan Dalgaard, Morten Olsen
1 citations
Journal of Economic Growth
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
0.83
article

Has the real rate of return “depreciated”?

Carl‐Johan Dalgaard, Morten Olsen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The average depreciation rate in the United States has increased since the 1970s, a pattern most likely matched in other advanced economies. We argue that a higher depreciation rate has reduced the risk-free interest rate. We do so in a quantitative overlapping-generations model which allows for risk-premia and market power. We show that the importance of the rate of depreciation on the risk-free interest rate depends crucially on the elasticity of intertemporal substitution as well as the size of market power. Our calibrated model shows that higher depreciation plausibly reduced the risk-free rate by 30 basis points over the past half century. We contrast our results with models using a representative-agent framework (Farhi and Gourio in Accounting for macro-finance trends: market power, intangibles, and risk premia. Brookings papers on economic activity, 147, 2019) which typically do not find a role for the rate of depreciation.

Journal of Economic GrowthVol. 30(1)
University of Copenhagen (DK), Danish Agriculture and Food Council (DK), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB)
Københavns Universitet
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
0.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.