Assessment of the Microhardness of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements After Microhydroxyapatite Incorporation: An In Vitro Study

Aim The study aimed to evaluate the impact of incorporating microhydroxyapatite on the microhardness of three different types of glass ionomer cement. Methodology A total of 120 disc-shaped specimens (7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) were prepared for the study, divided into three groups, each containing four subgroups of 10 samples. The materials tested included Zirconomer, conventional glass ionomer cement (CGIC), and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), with the addition of microhydroxyapatite in varying concentrations of 0, 5, 15, and 25 wt%. All specimens were stored in deionized water at 37ºC for 24 hours before being subjected to the Vickers microhardness test. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc honest significance test (HSD) test, with a significance level set at p<0.05. Results The addition of 5 and 15 wt% microhydroxyapatite to Zirconomer and RMGIC significantly increased microhardness (p<0.001). The highest Vickers hardness number (VHN) was observed in the RMGIC group with 5 wt% of microhydroxyapatite. However, the RMGIC group with 25 wt% microhydroxyapatite showed a lower VHN compared to the control group (without hydroxyapatite) (p<0.001). Conclusion The incorporation of 5 and 15 wt% microhydroxyapatite enhanced the microhardness of CGIC, RMGIC, and Zirconomer. However, adding 25 wt% of microhydroxyapatite to RMGIC resulted in a reduction in hardness compared to the control group without microhydroxyapatite.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71961
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of the Microhardness of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements After Microhydroxyapatite Incorporation: An In Vitro Study

Jayant Verma, Krishna Prasad Maity, Divya Mishra, Aishwarya Arya et al.
1 citations
Cureus
Dental materials and restorations
0.40
article

Assessment of the Microhardness of Three Different Glass Ionomer Cements After Microhydroxyapatite Incorporation: An In Vitro Study

Jayant Verma, Krishna Prasad Maity, Divya Mishra, Aishwarya Arya, Kanduri Venkata Naga Vamseekrishna, Bisma Jahangeer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aim The study aimed to evaluate the impact of incorporating microhydroxyapatite on the microhardness of three different types of glass ionomer cement. Methodology A total of 120 disc-shaped specimens (7 mm in diameter and 3 mm in height) were prepared for the study, divided into three groups, each containing four subgroups of 10 samples. The materials tested included Zirconomer, conventional glass ionomer cement (CGIC), and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), with the addition of microhydroxyapatite in varying concentrations of 0, 5, 15, and 25 wt%. All specimens were stored in deionized water at 37ºC for 24 hours before being subjected to the Vickers microhardness test. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc honest significance test (HSD) test, with a significance level set at p<0.05. Results The addition of 5 and 15 wt% microhydroxyapatite to Zirconomer and RMGIC significantly increased microhardness (p<0.001). The highest Vickers hardness number (VHN) was observed in the RMGIC group with 5 wt% of microhydroxyapatite. However, the RMGIC group with 25 wt% microhydroxyapatite showed a lower VHN compared to the control group (without hydroxyapatite) (p<0.001). Conclusion The incorporation of 5 and 15 wt% microhydroxyapatite enhanced the microhardness of CGIC, RMGIC, and Zirconomer. However, adding 25 wt% of microhydroxyapatite to RMGIC resulted in a reduction in hardness compared to the control group without microhydroxyapatite.

CureusVol. 16(10)
English Heritage (GB), American Association of Endodontists (US), Indra (Spain) (ES), Patanjali Research Foundation (IN), Govt. Dental College & Hospital (IN), Ragas Dental College & Hospital (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Dental materials and restorations
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.