Evaluation of the efficacy of preventive therapy in chronic migraine with or without medication overuse headache: data from a prospective study

Chronic migraine (CM) affects three out of every hundred people. As the frequency of attacks increases, so does the frequency of painkillers usage, and 85% of patients with CM are also diagnosed with medication overuse headache (MOH). Objective: to investigate the efficacy of preventive therapy of CM with or without MOH. Material and methods. The study involved 117 patients with CM and MOH (group 1) and 23 patients with CM without MOH (group 2), patients were examined at the initial visit and after 3 and 9 months of follow-up. All patients in the 1st group (CM+MOH) received a 7-day "detoxification" therapy. Patients in both groups were given an educational and information session on the type of their diagnosis, treatment methods and lifestyle correction. The choice of a preventive treatment in both groups was based on the current clinical recommendations, algorithms of modern international guidelines, concomitant pathology, the presence of contraindications in a particular patient, tolerability, as well as territorial and economic factors. Results. A positive effect was found in both groups, regardless of the presence of MOH. The lack of significant differences between the groups of CM with/without MOH is probably due to the use of "detoxification" therapy and the cessation/restriction of the use of the drug of abuse in all patients with CM and MOH, although a more pronounced positive dynamics is observed in patients of the 2nd group (CM without MOH), which in turn emphasizes the severity of the disease, the greater disability and the poorer prognosis for response to preventive treatment in the presence of MOH. It was found that one third of patients in the study favored monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) due to convenience, rapid onset of action and tolerability. In the group of patients with MOH, the best results were obtained when using injection methods of treatment (anti-CGRP mAbs, botulinum therapy) or when using combined therapy compared to monotherapy with venlafaxine or topiramate. Conclusion . All first-line drugs for the CM prophylactic treatment according to the clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of Russia are clearly effective, including cases with both CM and MOH. The use of combined therapy in CM with/without MOH can be effective even with a low initial response to one of the monotherapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurology neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14412/2074-2711-2024-1s-59-65
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Migraine and Headache Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the efficacy of preventive therapy in chronic migraine with or without medication overuse headache: data from a prospective study

А. В. Сергеев, E. A. Guziy, Г. Р. Табеева
4 citations
Neurology neuropsychiatry Psychosomatics
Migraine and Headache Studies
1.54
article

Evaluation of the efficacy of preventive therapy in chronic migraine with or without medication overuse headache: data from a prospective study

А. В. Сергеев, E. A. Guziy, Г. Р. Табеева
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Chronic migraine (CM) affects three out of every hundred people. As the frequency of attacks increases, so does the frequency of painkillers usage, and 85% of patients with CM are also diagnosed with medication overuse headache (MOH). Objective: to investigate the efficacy of preventive therapy of CM with or without MOH. Material and methods. The study involved 117 patients with CM and MOH (group 1) and 23 patients with CM without MOH (group 2), patients were examined at the initial visit and after 3 and 9 months of follow-up. All patients in the 1st group (CM+MOH) received a 7-day "detoxification" therapy. Patients in both groups were given an educational and information session on the type of their diagnosis, treatment methods and lifestyle correction. The choice of a preventive treatment in both groups was based on the current clinical recommendations, algorithms of modern international guidelines, concomitant pathology, the presence of contraindications in a particular patient, tolerability, as well as territorial and economic factors. Results. A positive effect was found in both groups, regardless of the presence of MOH. The lack of significant differences between the groups of CM with/without MOH is probably due to the use of "detoxification" therapy and the cessation/restriction of the use of the drug of abuse in all patients with CM and MOH, although a more pronounced positive dynamics is observed in patients of the 2nd group (CM without MOH), which in turn emphasizes the severity of the disease, the greater disability and the poorer prognosis for response to preventive treatment in the presence of MOH. It was found that one third of patients in the study favored monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) due to convenience, rapid onset of action and tolerability. In the group of patients with MOH, the best results were obtained when using injection methods of treatment (anti-CGRP mAbs, botulinum therapy) or when using combined therapy compared to monotherapy with venlafaxine or topiramate. Conclusion . All first-line drugs for the CM prophylactic treatment according to the clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of Russia are clearly effective, including cases with both CM and MOH. The use of combined therapy in CM with/without MOH can be effective even with a low initial response to one of the monotherapies.

Neurology neuropsychiatry PsychosomaticsVol. 16(1S)
Sechenov University (RU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Migraine and Headache Studies
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.