Dancing to the same tune? EU and US approaches to standards setting in the global digital sector

As both the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) construct their approaches to governing the digital economy in a global context, the role and influence of international organisations are being questioned. Specifically, the EU, traditionally a champion of multilateral regimes, has embarked on a strategy that tends toward a ‘digital sovereignty’ approach. However, the EU’s sovereigntist approach relies upon the power of multilateral regimes to ensure ‘managed interdependence’. This article focuses on the differences between the EU and the US regarding global standardisation processes and bodies. It argues that across the Atlantic, there is political agreement on how to manage standards development, but that policies to achieve this often diverge. This article focuses on some of the efforts of the EU-US Trade and Technology Council working group on standardization to show how this agreement on politics, but not policies, has emerged.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of European Integration
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2024.2398430
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dancing to the same tune? EU and US approaches to standards setting in the global digital sector

Jamal Shahin
9 citations
Journal of European Integration
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
20.08
article

Dancing to the same tune? EU and US approaches to standards setting in the global digital sector

Jamal Shahin
article en
9 citations

Abstract

As both the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) construct their approaches to governing the digital economy in a global context, the role and influence of international organisations are being questioned. Specifically, the EU, traditionally a champion of multilateral regimes, has embarked on a strategy that tends toward a ‘digital sovereignty’ approach. However, the EU’s sovereigntist approach relies upon the power of multilateral regimes to ensure ‘managed interdependence’. This article focuses on the differences between the EU and the US regarding global standardisation processes and bodies. It argues that across the Atlantic, there is political agreement on how to manage standards development, but that policies to achieve this often diverge. This article focuses on some of the efforts of the EU-US Trade and Technology Council working group on standardization to show how this agreement on politics, but not policies, has emerged.

Journal of European IntegrationVol. 46(7)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), United Nations University Institute on Comparative Regional Integration Studies (BE), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
20.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dancing to the same tune? EU and US approaches to standards setting in the global digital sector — Jamal Shahin · Journal of European Integration (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS