Sixty Years of the Maximum Principle in Optimal Control: Historical Roots and Content Classification

This study examines the scientific production focused on the Maximum Principle between 1962 and 2021. Results indicate a consistent increase in the absolute number of publications over time. In relative terms, there is a resurgence of interest in this research field after the period between 2004 and 2009. Overall, these findings support the idea of strategic complementarity between the Maximum Principle and optimal control. However, there is a notable exception during the period 2010–2015, characterised by a decline in scientific production focused on the Maximum Principle and a simultaneous increase in focus on optimal control. Academic journals that play a role in promoting this research field tend to have high impact factors and interesting cite scores. Using a modified Boston Consulting Group matrix, the results reveal the persistence of two researchers labelled as stars and three as cash cows. A multiple linear regression analysis confirms that reputation significantly influences the clustering trends. A critical discussion is provided to highlight the dichotomy between popularity and effective contributions in this research field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Symmetry
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16101398
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Economic theories and models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.03

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sixty Years of the Maximum Principle in Optimal Control: Historical Roots and Content Classification

Vítor Miguel Ribeiro, Roman Chertovskih, Rui Gonçalves, A. Pedro Aguiar
8 citations
Symmetry
Economic theories and models
9.03
article

Sixty Years of the Maximum Principle in Optimal Control: Historical Roots and Content Classification

Vítor Miguel Ribeiro, Roman Chertovskih, Rui Gonçalves, A. Pedro Aguiar
article en
8 citations

Abstract

This study examines the scientific production focused on the Maximum Principle between 1962 and 2021. Results indicate a consistent increase in the absolute number of publications over time. In relative terms, there is a resurgence of interest in this research field after the period between 2004 and 2009. Overall, these findings support the idea of strategic complementarity between the Maximum Principle and optimal control. However, there is a notable exception during the period 2010–2015, characterised by a decline in scientific production focused on the Maximum Principle and a simultaneous increase in focus on optimal control. Academic journals that play a role in promoting this research field tend to have high impact factors and interesting cite scores. Using a modified Boston Consulting Group matrix, the results reveal the persistence of two researchers labelled as stars and three as cash cows. A multiple linear regression analysis confirms that reputation significantly influences the clustering trends. A critical discussion is provided to highlight the dichotomy between popularity and effective contributions in this research field.

SymmetryVol. 16(10)
Universidade do Porto (PT), INESC TEC (PT)
Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Economic theories and models
9.03
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.