Rehabilitation for Patients with COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During Quarantine: A Single-Center Experience

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: In this study, we evaluated clinical factors associated with implementing a rehabilitation program for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) during the quarantine period. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This observational study was conducted in the National Designated Isolated ICU, a dedicated COVID-19 center with 18 beds, from 30 December 2020 to 30 May 2022. One hundred and fifty-four patients (mean age: 67.3 ± 13.4 years; male: 59.7%) were enrolled. The ICU rehabilitation program included early mobilization, chest physiotherapy, and dysphagia treatment. <i>Results</i>: Forty-five patients (29.3%) participated in the rehabilitation program. Multivariate logistic regression identified three significant factors: tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR], 2.796; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.238-6.316; <i>p</i> = 0.013), body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (OR, 2.724; 95% CI, 1.276-5.817; <i>p</i> = 0.010), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 2.931; 95% CI, 1.165-7.377; <i>p</i> = 0.022); patients with all three factors were younger (median 44 vs. 70 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and had significantly lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (median 12 vs. 16, <i>p</i> = 0.002) on the MV day. One-year cumulative mortality rates for patients with 0 to 3 factors were 66.7%, 50.8%, 38.9%, and 15.4%, respectively, with a significant difference among them (log-rank, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>: Three clinical factors associated with implementing a rehabilitation program during the quarantine period for COVID-19-associated ARDS patients were identified. The program was feasible and beneficial, particularly for younger patients with lower illness severity and fewer comorbidities on the day of MV.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101719
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rehabilitation for Patients with COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During Quarantine: A Single-Center Experience

Myung Hun Jang, Kwangha Lee, Wanho Yoo, Hyojin Jang et al.
3 citations
Medicina
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
1.26
article

Rehabilitation for Patients with COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome During Quarantine: A Single-Center Experience

Myung Hun Jang, Kwangha Lee, Wanho Yoo, Hyojin Jang, Ho Jeong Shin, Yong Beom Shin, Eun Suk Jeong, Saerom Kim
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives</i>: In this study, we evaluated clinical factors associated with implementing a rehabilitation program for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) during the quarantine period. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: This observational study was conducted in the National Designated Isolated ICU, a dedicated COVID-19 center with 18 beds, from 30 December 2020 to 30 May 2022. One hundred and fifty-four patients (mean age: 67.3 ± 13.4 years; male: 59.7%) were enrolled. The ICU rehabilitation program included early mobilization, chest physiotherapy, and dysphagia treatment. <i>Results</i>: Forty-five patients (29.3%) participated in the rehabilitation program. Multivariate logistic regression identified three significant factors: tracheostomy (odds ratio [OR], 2.796; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.238-6.316; <i>p</i> = 0.013), body mass index ≥ 25.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (OR, 2.724; 95% CI, 1.276-5.817; <i>p</i> = 0.010), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (OR, 2.931; 95% CI, 1.165-7.377; <i>p</i> = 0.022); patients with all three factors were younger (median 44 vs. 70 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and had significantly lower Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores (median 12 vs. 16, <i>p</i> = 0.002) on the MV day. One-year cumulative mortality rates for patients with 0 to 3 factors were 66.7%, 50.8%, 38.9%, and 15.4%, respectively, with a significant difference among them (log-rank, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <i>Conclusions</i>: Three clinical factors associated with implementing a rehabilitation program during the quarantine period for COVID-19-associated ARDS patients were identified. The program was feasible and beneficial, particularly for younger patients with lower illness severity and fewer comorbidities on the day of MV.

MedicinaVol. 60(10)
Catholic University of Pusan (KR), Pusan National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
1.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.