Understanding the Relationship of Conflict, Psychological safety, and Success in Software Development Projects

Software development involves complex socio-technical activities with common conflicts arising from human and non-human factors. However, the impact of these conflicts, particularly non-human ones, on project success still needs to be investigated. Psychological safety is a key to mitigating these conflicts. In this paper, we aim to understand how conflicts and psychological safety impact the success of software development projects—considering the categorization of conflicts into human-rooted (HRC) and non-human-rooted (NHRC) and examining organization size, team size, and psychological safety as moderating factors. To achieve our goal, we replicated an existing study in the area and included new hypotheses; we also adapted the surveys to Portuguese, used a structured survey to collect data, and applied structural equation modeling for the analysis. The results include the reception of 155 responses and show that human-rooted conflict strongly negatively impacts software project success, regardless of organization or team size. Non-human-rooted conflict positively affects project success only in corporations (> 100 employees) but negatively impacts small and medium-sized organizations (< 100 employees). While not directly correlated with project success, psychological safety appears as a crucial moderating factor.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5753/sbes.2024.3607
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Relationship of Conflict, Psychological safety, and Success in Software Development Projects

Brenda M. S. da Silva, Maria Lencastre, Wilfredo Barrientos Farías, Roberta Fagundes
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Understanding the Relationship of Conflict, Psychological safety, and Success in Software Development Projects

Brenda M. S. da Silva, Maria Lencastre, Wilfredo Barrientos Farías, Roberta Fagundes
article en

Abstract

Software development involves complex socio-technical activities with common conflicts arising from human and non-human factors. However, the impact of these conflicts, particularly non-human ones, on project success still needs to be investigated. Psychological safety is a key to mitigating these conflicts. In this paper, we aim to understand how conflicts and psychological safety impact the success of software development projects—considering the categorization of conflicts into human-rooted (HRC) and non-human-rooted (NHRC) and examining organization size, team size, and psychological safety as moderating factors. To achieve our goal, we replicated an existing study in the area and included new hypotheses; we also adapted the surveys to Portuguese, used a structured survey to collect data, and applied structural equation modeling for the analysis. The results include the reception of 155 responses and show that human-rooted conflict strongly negatively impacts software project success, regardless of organization or team size. Non-human-rooted conflict positively affects project success only in corporations (> 100 employees) but negatively impacts small and medium-sized organizations (< 100 employees). While not directly correlated with project success, psychological safety appears as a crucial moderating factor.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.