COMPARISON OF CREATININE DEIMINASE IMMOBILIZATION METHODS FOR DESIGN OF POTENTIOMETRIC BIOSENSORS FOR CREATININE DETECTION

The main analytical characteristics of the potentiometric biosensor based on creatinine deiminase were investigated when working with model samples, and comparison for various enzyme immobilization methods was made. It was found that all sensors are characterized by a similar operating range, response time and high operational stability. At the same time, the sensitivity of the biosensor to creatinine was 2 times higher for the option of immobilization in a drop of glutaraldehyde. Storage stability was high for all immobilization methods, with the exception of immobilization in glutaraldehyde vapors, when the value of the sensor response dropped by 50% after 100 days of storage. The dependences on the experimental conditions were typical for enzyme biosensors and did not depend on the enzyme immobilization method. The linear range of creatinine determination is quite suitable for further work with real blood samples and dialysis fluid when diluted 10 times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensor Electronics and Microsystem Technologies
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18524/1815-7459.2024.3.312688
Primary Topic
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF CREATININE DEIMINASE IMMOBILIZATION METHODS FOR DESIGN OF POTENTIOMETRIC BIOSENSORS FOR CREATININE DETECTION

О. О. Солдаткін, Yu. V. Karpenko, V. М. Arkhypova, S. V. Dzyadevych et al.
Sensor Electronics and Microsystem Technologies
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
article

COMPARISON OF CREATININE DEIMINASE IMMOBILIZATION METHODS FOR DESIGN OF POTENTIOMETRIC BIOSENSORS FOR CREATININE DETECTION

О. О. Солдаткін, Yu. V. Karpenko, V. М. Arkhypova, S. V. Dzyadevych, V. A. Bakhmat, I. S. Knyr
article en

Abstract

The main analytical characteristics of the potentiometric biosensor based on creatinine deiminase were investigated when working with model samples, and comparison for various enzyme immobilization methods was made. It was found that all sensors are characterized by a similar operating range, response time and high operational stability. At the same time, the sensitivity of the biosensor to creatinine was 2 times higher for the option of immobilization in a drop of glutaraldehyde. Storage stability was high for all immobilization methods, with the exception of immobilization in glutaraldehyde vapors, when the value of the sensor response dropped by 50% after 100 days of storage. The dependences on the experimental conditions were typical for enzyme biosensors and did not depend on the enzyme immobilization method. The linear range of creatinine determination is quite suitable for further work with real blood samples and dialysis fluid when diluted 10 times.

Sensor Electronics and Microsystem TechnologiesVol. 21(3)
Institute of Endocrinology (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

COMPARISON OF CREATININE DEIMINASE IMMOBILIZATION METHODS FOR DESIGN OF POTENTIOMETRIC BIOSENSORS FOR CREATININE DETECTION — О. О. Солдаткін, Yu. V. Karpenko, et al. · Sensor Electronics and Microsystem Technologies (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS