SPECT/CT Accurately Predicts Postoperative Lung Function in Patients with Limited Pulmonary Reserve Undergoing Resection for Lung Cancer
<b>Background:</b> Preoperative prediction of postoperative pulmonary function after anatomical resection for lung cancer is essential to prevent long-term morbidity and mortality. Here, we compared the accuracy of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) with traditional anatomical and planar scintigraphy approaches in predicting postoperative pulmonary function in patients with impaired lung function. <b>Methods:</b> We analyzed the predicted postoperative pulmonary function in patients undergoing major anatomical lung resection, applying a segment counting approach, planar perfusion scintigraphy (PPS), and SPECT/CT-based lung function quantification. <b>Results:</b> In total, 120 patients were evaluated, of whom 82 were included in the study. Postoperative lung function tests were obtained in 21 of 82 patients. The preoperative SPECT/CT-based quantification yielded very accurate results compared to the actual postoperative FEV1 and DLCO values. The linear regression analysis showed that the SPECT/CT-based analysis predicted postoperative FEV<sub>1</sub> (%) and D<sub>LCO</sub> values more accurately than the segment counting approach or PPS. Accordingly, 58/82 patients would qualify for anatomical lung resection according to the SPECT-based quantification, 56/82 qualified according to the PPS (Mende), and only 47/82 qualified according to the segment counting method. Moreover, we noted that the SPECT-predicted FEV<sub>1</sub> values were very close to the actual postoperative values in emphysema patients, and selected patients even showed improved lung function after surgery. <b>Conclusions</b>: Anatomically driven methods such as SPECT/CT yielded a very accurate prediction of the postoperative pulmonary function. Accordingly, applying SPECT/CT revealed more patients who would formally qualify for lung resection. We suggest SPECT/CT as the preferred method to evaluate eligibility for lung surgery in selected patients with impaired pulmonary reserve.
Authors
- Bernward Passlick (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4684-0625)
- Isabelle Moneke (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1019-5214)
- Philipp T. Meyer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-750X)
- Christine von Nida
- Laurin Titze
- Christian Goetz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-0813)
- Mirjam Elze
- Oemer Senbaklavaci
Institutions
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- University Medical Center Freiburg (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Published
- 2024-10-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13206111
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.68