Peer learning and peer assessment in institutions of higher education

The article examines the types of control and the most important principles of evaluating the knowledge of higher education students; the advantages of the modular rating system for the organization of training and training in "peer-to-peer" or peering training conditions are shown; the basis of peer learning is considered and various definitions of peer assessment are proposed. The basis of peering interaction is Web 3.0 technologies, the Internet, a large number of open educational resources (OER), and mass digitization of various materials. Peer 2 Peer University (P2PU) is an example of peering interaction and its successful functioning system. The system of peering interaction using ICT is revealed and the possibilities for peering assessment, which are provided in the applications of research learning spaces, are shown. The features of peer evaluation and consideration of these features when developing evaluation criteria are described. Based on the results of the ascertainment experiment and the conclusions regarding the renewal and improvement of the educational sector, in general, and the evaluation of higher education applicants, in particular, a model of digital tools and methods of introducing peer evaluation into the educational process of higher education institutions was introduced into the educational process of higher education institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EDUWEB
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.03.10
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Learning Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer learning and peer assessment in institutions of higher education

Віта Ворона, Sofiya Chovriy, Nataliia Makhynia, Дмитро Ткачук et al.
1 citations
EDUWEB
Higher Education Learning Practices
2.10
article

Peer learning and peer assessment in institutions of higher education

Віта Ворона, Sofiya Chovriy, Nataliia Makhynia, Дмитро Ткачук, Геннадій МАГАСЬ, Анжеліка Курчатова
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article examines the types of control and the most important principles of evaluating the knowledge of higher education students; the advantages of the modular rating system for the organization of training and training in "peer-to-peer" or peering training conditions are shown; the basis of peer learning is considered and various definitions of peer assessment are proposed. The basis of peering interaction is Web 3.0 technologies, the Internet, a large number of open educational resources (OER), and mass digitization of various materials. Peer 2 Peer University (P2PU) is an example of peering interaction and its successful functioning system. The system of peering interaction using ICT is revealed and the possibilities for peering assessment, which are provided in the applications of research learning spaces, are shown. The features of peer evaluation and consideration of these features when developing evaluation criteria are described. Based on the results of the ascertainment experiment and the conclusions regarding the renewal and improvement of the educational sector, in general, and the evaluation of higher education applicants, in particular, a model of digital tools and methods of introducing peer evaluation into the educational process of higher education institutions was introduced into the educational process of higher education institutions.

EDUWEBVol. 18(3)
Sumy State University (UA), Mykolaiv V.O. Sukhomlynskyi National University (UA), Security Service of Ukraine (UA), Cherkasy State Technological University (UA), Ferenc Rakoczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian University (UA), Bohdan Khmelnytskyi National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Higher Education Learning Practices
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.