Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Photo Finish® Smartphone App to Measure Sprint Time

In athletic training and research, the evaluation of sprint speed is widely used, and its accurate measurement is especially demanding. High-cost photocells are the gold-standard system for sprint time assessment, although low-cost smartphone applications can be a suitable option. This study assesses the validity and reliability of an application to measure sprint time compared to photocells. Five physically active subjects completed six sprints of 10 m and 20 m at maximal speed and a 5 m go and return sprint to evaluate the validity of the Photo Finish<sup>®</sup> app (Version 2.30). To assess reliability, six trials of 5 m go and return sprints were measured by two smartphones. The validity results showed a mean bias of 0.012 s (95% CL: 0.000, 0.024) between the application and the photocells for the 10 m sprint, 0.007 s (95% CL: -0.007, 0.022) for the 20 m sprint and 0.005 s (95% CL: -0.005, 0.017) for the 5 m go and return test. The results also found R<sup>2</sup> between both systems (R<sup>2</sup>= 0.9863, 0.990 and 0.958) for each distance (10 m, 20 m and 5 m go and return, respectively). As for reliability, the application showed outstanding consistency between two smartphones operating simultaneously (ICC 0.999; R<sup>2</sup>: 0.999). This study shows that the Photo Finish<sup>®</sup> app is an accurate and reliable tool to measure sprint time with an error of 0.09 s.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s24206719
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Photo Finish® Smartphone App to Measure Sprint Time

Hector Gutiérrez, Luis Alberto Marco-Contreras, César Berzosa, Jorge Sánchez‐Sabaté et al.
7 citations
Sensors
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
4.50
article

Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Photo Finish® Smartphone App to Measure Sprint Time

Hector Gutiérrez, Luis Alberto Marco-Contreras, César Berzosa, Jorge Sánchez‐Sabaté, Ana Vanessa Bataller-Cervero
article en
7 citations

Abstract

In athletic training and research, the evaluation of sprint speed is widely used, and its accurate measurement is especially demanding. High-cost photocells are the gold-standard system for sprint time assessment, although low-cost smartphone applications can be a suitable option. This study assesses the validity and reliability of an application to measure sprint time compared to photocells. Five physically active subjects completed six sprints of 10 m and 20 m at maximal speed and a 5 m go and return sprint to evaluate the validity of the Photo Finish<sup>®</sup> app (Version 2.30). To assess reliability, six trials of 5 m go and return sprints were measured by two smartphones. The validity results showed a mean bias of 0.012 s (95% CL: 0.000, 0.024) between the application and the photocells for the 10 m sprint, 0.007 s (95% CL: -0.007, 0.022) for the 20 m sprint and 0.005 s (95% CL: -0.005, 0.017) for the 5 m go and return test. The results also found R<sup>2</sup> between both systems (R<sup>2</sup>= 0.9863, 0.990 and 0.958) for each distance (10 m, 20 m and 5 m go and return, respectively). As for reliability, the application showed outstanding consistency between two smartphones operating simultaneously (ICC 0.999; R<sup>2</sup>: 0.999). This study shows that the Photo Finish<sup>®</sup> app is an accurate and reliable tool to measure sprint time with an error of 0.09 s.

SensorsVol. 24(20)
Universidad San Jorge (ES)
Gobierno de Aragón
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
4.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.