Comparison of Methods for Modeling Phase Dynamics Using the Models of Different Orders

Analyzing the intensity and directionality of couplings between different systems is a very complex and important task in studying the functioning of physiological systems. To carry out such a study, the phase dynamics modeling method can be used. We propose to simplify the structure of the phase dynamics model in order to reduce time for calculating estimates of coupling intensity. It is shown that the proposed changes made it possible to reduce the time for calculating the coupling estimates by 2.97 times, while coupling intensity obtained by the two methods differ by less than 1 percent. The changes in the phase dynamics modeling method proposed in this paper will make it easier to work with long time series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/dcna63495.2024.10718454
Primary Topic
Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Methods for Modeling Phase Dynamics Using the Models of Different Orders

Б. П. Безручко, М. Д. Прохоров, Aleksey N. Hramkov, Anatoly S. Karavaev
Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
article

Comparison of Methods for Modeling Phase Dynamics Using the Models of Different Orders

Б. П. Безручко, М. Д. Прохоров, Aleksey N. Hramkov, Anatoly S. Karavaev
article en

Abstract

Analyzing the intensity and directionality of couplings between different systems is a very complex and important task in studying the functioning of physiological systems. To carry out such a study, the phase dynamics modeling method can be used. We propose to simplify the structure of the phase dynamics model in order to reduce time for calculating estimates of coupling intensity. It is shown that the proposed changes made it possible to reduce the time for calculating the coupling estimates by 2.97 times, while coupling intensity obtained by the two methods differ by less than 1 percent. The changes in the phase dynamics modeling method proposed in this paper will make it easier to work with long time series.

Saratov State University (RU), Institute of Physics (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Solidification and crystal growth phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Methods for Modeling Phase Dynamics Using the Models of Different Orders — Б. П. Безручко, М. Д. Прохоров, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS