Differences in optimal community structure in brain connectivity organization in major depressive disorder

We analyzed fMRI data from healthy control subjects (94 subjects) and patients with major depressive episode (70 patients). The preprocessed activity signals extracted with statistical parametric mapping from fMRI were divided into parcellations according to the anatomical labeling atlas. Our findings indicate that patients with major depressive disorder exhibit network organization that is both less locally specialized and less globally integrated. Specifically, our research reveals differences in network segregation rather than integration in patients. The discrepancies between our results and previous studies may be attributed to differences in methodology, depression diversity, sample sizes, and co-occurring factors such as stress and anxiety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/dcna63495.2024.10718407
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in optimal community structure in brain connectivity organization in major depressive disorder

Drozdstoy Stoyanov, Rositsa Paunova, Semen Kurkin, Vladimir Khorev et al.
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Differences in optimal community structure in brain connectivity organization in major depressive disorder

Drozdstoy Stoyanov, Rositsa Paunova, Semen Kurkin, Vladimir Khorev, Tatiana Bukina
article en

Abstract

We analyzed fMRI data from healthy control subjects (94 subjects) and patients with major depressive episode (70 patients). The preprocessed activity signals extracted with statistical parametric mapping from fMRI were divided into parcellations according to the anatomical labeling atlas. Our findings indicate that patients with major depressive disorder exhibit network organization that is both less locally specialized and less globally integrated. Specifically, our research reveals differences in network segregation rather than integration in patients. The discrepancies between our results and previous studies may be attributed to differences in methodology, depression diversity, sample sizes, and co-occurring factors such as stress and anxiety.

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (RU), Medical University Plovdiv (BG), Innopolis University (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.