Machine Learning Model Trained with Finite Element Modeling Can Predict the Risk of Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Objective: Despite long simulation times, recently developed finite element analysis (FEA) models of knee joints have demonstrated their suitability for predicting individual risk of onset and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of machine learning (ML) to replicate outcomes obtained from FEA when simulating mechanical responses and predicting cartilage degeneration within the knee joint. Design: Two ML models based on the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) algorithms were developed. The first model (GPR1) utilized age, weight, and anatomical joint dimensions as predictor variables to predict tissue mechanical responses and cartilage degeneration based on FEA data. The second model (GPR2) utilized age, weight, height, and gender to predict anatomical joint dimensions, which were then used as inputs in the GPR1 model. Finally, the GPR1 and combined GPR1+GPR2 models were used to investigate the importance of clinical imaging when making personalized predictions for knees from healthy subjects with no history of knee injuries. Results: In the GPR1 model, R2 of 0.9 was exceeded for most of the predicted mechanical parameters. The GPR2 model was able to predict knee shape with R2 of 0.67–0.9. Both GPR1 and combined GPR1+GPR2 models offered equally good performances (AUC = 0.73–0.74) in classifying patients at high risk for the onset and development of knee osteoarthritis. Conclusions: In the future, real-time and easy-to-use GPR models may provide a rapid technology to evaluate mechanical responses within the knee for researchers or clinicians who have no former knowledge of FEA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2024-10-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209538
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Model Trained with Finite Element Modeling Can Predict the Risk of Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Mikael J. Turunen, Mika E. Mononen, Mimmi K. Liukkonen
4 citations
Applied Sciences
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
1.88
article

Machine Learning Model Trained with Finite Element Modeling Can Predict the Risk of Osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Mikael J. Turunen, Mika E. Mononen, Mimmi K. Liukkonen
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Objective: Despite long simulation times, recently developed finite element analysis (FEA) models of knee joints have demonstrated their suitability for predicting individual risk of onset and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of machine learning (ML) to replicate outcomes obtained from FEA when simulating mechanical responses and predicting cartilage degeneration within the knee joint. Design: Two ML models based on the Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) algorithms were developed. The first model (GPR1) utilized age, weight, and anatomical joint dimensions as predictor variables to predict tissue mechanical responses and cartilage degeneration based on FEA data. The second model (GPR2) utilized age, weight, height, and gender to predict anatomical joint dimensions, which were then used as inputs in the GPR1 model. Finally, the GPR1 and combined GPR1+GPR2 models were used to investigate the importance of clinical imaging when making personalized predictions for knees from healthy subjects with no history of knee injuries. Results: In the GPR1 model, R2 of 0.9 was exceeded for most of the predicted mechanical parameters. The GPR2 model was able to predict knee shape with R2 of 0.67–0.9. Both GPR1 and combined GPR1+GPR2 models offered equally good performances (AUC = 0.73–0.74) in classifying patients at high risk for the onset and development of knee osteoarthritis. Conclusions: In the future, real-time and easy-to-use GPR models may provide a rapid technology to evaluate mechanical responses within the knee for researchers or clinicians who have no former knowledge of FEA.

Applied SciencesVol. 14(20)
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.