Evaluation of an empirical model for predicting the calorific value of biomass briquettes from candlenut shells and kesambi twigs

Biomass briquettes offer a sustainable alternative to conventional fossil fuels, contributing to renewable energy while reducing environmental impact. This research explores the development of biomass briquettes from candlenut shell charcoal (Aleurites moluccanus) and kesambi twigs (Schleichera oleosa), focusing on their physical properties and heating values. Using tapioca as a binder, briquettes were produced with varying ratios: A. Control (90% kesambi twigs + 10% adhesive), B. 3:1 (67.5% kesambi twigs + 22.5% candlenut shell charcoal + 10% adhesive), C. 1:1 (45% kesambi twigs + 45% candlenut shell charcoal + 10% adhesive), and D. 1:3 (22.5% kesambi twigs + 67.5% candlenut shell charcoal + 10% adhesive). The study aimed to optimize briquette composition for maximum density, compressive strength, and calorific value while minimizing moisture, ash, and volatile matter. Results indicated that a higher proportion of candlenut shell charcoal enhanced density, compressive strength, and fixed carbon content, with the highest calorific value exceeding 19 MJ/kg observed in the 1:3 ratio. Additionally, the study evaluated three empirical models for predicting the Higher Heating Value (HHV) of the briquettes, finding the Nhuchhen model to be the most accurate, with an R² value of 0.93, providing a reliable method for predicting calorific value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Food Science Sustainable Agriculture and Agroindustrial Engineering
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.afssaae.2024.007.03.6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of an empirical model for predicting the calorific value of biomass briquettes from candlenut shells and kesambi twigs

Jemmy Jonson Sula Dethan
1 citations
Advances in Food Science Sustainable Agriculture and Agroindustrial Engineering
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
0.27
article

Evaluation of an empirical model for predicting the calorific value of biomass briquettes from candlenut shells and kesambi twigs

Jemmy Jonson Sula Dethan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Biomass briquettes offer a sustainable alternative to conventional fossil fuels, contributing to renewable energy while reducing environmental impact. This research explores the development of biomass briquettes from candlenut shell charcoal (Aleurites moluccanus) and kesambi twigs (Schleichera oleosa), focusing on their physical properties and heating values. Using tapioca as a binder, briquettes were produced with varying ratios: A. Control (90% kesambi twigs + 10% adhesive), B. 3:1 (67.5% kesambi twigs + 22.5% candlenut shell charcoal + 10% adhesive), C. 1:1 (45% kesambi twigs + 45% candlenut shell charcoal + 10% adhesive), and D. 1:3 (22.5% kesambi twigs + 67.5% candlenut shell charcoal + 10% adhesive). The study aimed to optimize briquette composition for maximum density, compressive strength, and calorific value while minimizing moisture, ash, and volatile matter. Results indicated that a higher proportion of candlenut shell charcoal enhanced density, compressive strength, and fixed carbon content, with the highest calorific value exceeding 19 MJ/kg observed in the 1:3 ratio. Additionally, the study evaluated three empirical models for predicting the Higher Heating Value (HHV) of the briquettes, finding the Nhuchhen model to be the most accurate, with an R² value of 0.93, providing a reliable method for predicting calorific value.

Advances in Food Science Sustainable Agriculture and Agroindustrial EngineeringVol. 7(3)
Artha Wacana Christian University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
0.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.