Research on Safety Awareness and Current Safety Confirmation Methods for Genome-edited Foods

Although the safety of genome-edited foods in Japan has been confirmed through pre-submission consultation under the notification process, public perception of safety confirmation methodology has not been investigated to date. Therefore, we created three media to provide information on the safety assurance of genome-edited foods and surveyed the perception of current safety confirmation. In addition, we examined the opinions of researchers in health science on current safety confirmation methods. As a result, 62% of general consumers and 68% of researchers in health science recognized that safety is ensured. Acceptance of genome-edited foods improved when they realized that safety was ensured. Researchers in health science who felt that safety confirmation was insufficient were concerned about the third-party verification. Therefore, it was suggested that in order to boost public understanding of genome-edited foods, it would be useful to inform the public by communicating in an easy-to-understand way the safety assurance approaches being made in pre-submission consultation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi)
Published
2024-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.65.89
Citations
1
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on Safety Awareness and Current Safety Confirmation Methods for Genome-edited Foods

Norihito Shibata, Chie Taguchi, Kazunari Kondo
1 citations
Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi)
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
0.23
article

Research on Safety Awareness and Current Safety Confirmation Methods for Genome-edited Foods

Norihito Shibata, Chie Taguchi, Kazunari Kondo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although the safety of genome-edited foods in Japan has been confirmed through pre-submission consultation under the notification process, public perception of safety confirmation methodology has not been investigated to date. Therefore, we created three media to provide information on the safety assurance of genome-edited foods and surveyed the perception of current safety confirmation. In addition, we examined the opinions of researchers in health science on current safety confirmation methods. As a result, 62% of general consumers and 68% of researchers in health science recognized that safety is ensured. Acceptance of genome-edited foods improved when they realized that safety was ensured. Researchers in health science who felt that safety confirmation was insufficient were concerned about the third-party verification. Therefore, it was suggested that in order to boost public understanding of genome-edited foods, it would be useful to inform the public by communicating in an easy-to-understand way the safety assurance approaches being made in pre-submission consultation.

Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi)Vol. 65(4)
Showa Women's University (JP), National Institute of Health Sciences (LK)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
0.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Research on Safety Awareness and Current Safety Confirmation Methods for Genome-edited Foods — Norihito Shibata, Chie Taguchi, et al. · Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS