Uneasiness in interdisciplinary research and the importance of metaphors: A case story on building an interdisciplinary chronic pain research team

Interdisciplinary research is increasingly recognized as a key method to tackle complex societal challenges and stimulate creativity to find innovative solutions. Our key goal when starting our collaboration was to come to innovative ways of treating chronic pain. An ambitious goal that requires out-of-the-box and high-risk-high-gain research. However, interdisciplinary research in practice can be uneasy and will not always be successful. This paper describes a case story focussing on the challenges we faced building an interdisciplinary team. One of the most important lessons is that researchers from different disciplines may think they speak a universal 'language of science', but a thorough understanding of each other's ways of working, research paradigms, methods, and concepts is necessary before they can start working together on solving scientific questions. In fact, if researchers cannot understand each other's language, they cannot expect patients to understand scientific language either. Lastly, for academics to engage with a non-scientific audience and vice-versa, we need to find and create places to meet and find ways to interact effectively. Language is the medium through which all these interactions take place. It is therefore essential that language takes a central place in the process of collaboration across disciplines, interdisciplinary research, patient participation and public engagement. In this case story, we share our experiences in creating a common language, summarized in five steps (1: creating the team; 2: metaphor-forced introduction to disciplines; 3: creating common ground; 4: outreach; 5: integration). Metaphors play an important role in this process. We will demonstrate how we reflectively progressed through these steps while enhancing interdisciplinarity, (scientific) innovation and public engagement. This five-step journey can be used as a process-tool for any other high-risk-high-gain research team seeking to innovate through interdisciplinarity - with the risk of becoming a brilliant failure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PEC Innovation
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100350
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uneasiness in interdisciplinary research and the importance of metaphors: A case story on building an interdisciplinary chronic pain research team

Madelijn Strick, Frank J. Meye, Sylvia Brugman, Hanneke L.D.M. Willemen et al.
1 citations
PEC Innovation
Empathy and Medical Education
0.39
article

Uneasiness in interdisciplinary research and the importance of metaphors: A case story on building an interdisciplinary chronic pain research team

Madelijn Strick, Frank J. Meye, Sylvia Brugman, Hanneke L.D.M. Willemen, Janny C. de Grauw, Laura H.H. Winkens, Tessa C. van Charldorp, Yoeri van de Burgt, Mienke Rijsdijk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research is increasingly recognized as a key method to tackle complex societal challenges and stimulate creativity to find innovative solutions. Our key goal when starting our collaboration was to come to innovative ways of treating chronic pain. An ambitious goal that requires out-of-the-box and high-risk-high-gain research. However, interdisciplinary research in practice can be uneasy and will not always be successful. This paper describes a case story focussing on the challenges we faced building an interdisciplinary team. One of the most important lessons is that researchers from different disciplines may think they speak a universal 'language of science', but a thorough understanding of each other's ways of working, research paradigms, methods, and concepts is necessary before they can start working together on solving scientific questions. In fact, if researchers cannot understand each other's language, they cannot expect patients to understand scientific language either. Lastly, for academics to engage with a non-scientific audience and vice-versa, we need to find and create places to meet and find ways to interact effectively. Language is the medium through which all these interactions take place. It is therefore essential that language takes a central place in the process of collaboration across disciplines, interdisciplinary research, patient participation and public engagement. In this case story, we share our experiences in creating a common language, summarized in five steps (1: creating the team; 2: metaphor-forced introduction to disciplines; 3: creating common ground; 4: outreach; 5: integration). Metaphors play an important role in this process. We will demonstrate how we reflectively progressed through these steps while enhancing interdisciplinarity, (scientific) innovation and public engagement. This five-step journey can be used as a process-tool for any other high-risk-high-gain research team seeking to innovate through interdisciplinarity - with the risk of becoming a brilliant failure.

PEC InnovationVol. 5
University of London (GB), Royal Veterinary College (GB), University of Applied Sciences Utrecht (NL), Utrecht University (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Universiteit Utrecht, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Wageningen University and Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Empathy and Medical Education
0.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.