Multiple Instance Learning for WSI: A comparative analysis of attention-based approaches

Whole slide images (WSI), obtained by high-resolution digital scanning of microscope slides at multiple scales, are the cornerstone of modern Digital Pathology. However, they represent a particular challenge to artificial intelligence (AI)-based/AI-mediated analysis because pathology labeling is typically done at slide-level, instead of tile-level. It is not just that medical diagnostics is recorded at the specimen level, the detection of oncogene mutation is also experimentally obtained, and recorded by initiatives like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), at the slide level. This configures a dual challenge: (a) accurately predicting the overall cancer phenotype and (b) finding out what cellular morphologies are associated with it at the tile level. To better understand and address these challenges, two existing weakly supervised Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) approaches were explored and compared: Attention MIL (AMIL) and Additive MIL (AdMIL). These architectures were analyzed on tumor detection (a task where these models obtained good results previously) and TP53 mutation detection (a much less explored task). For tumor detection, we built a dataset from Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA-LUSC) slides, with 349 positive and 349 negative slides. The patches were extracted from 5× magnification. For TP53 mutation detection, we explored a dataset built from Invasive Breast Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) slides, with 347 positive and 347 negative slides. In this case, we explored three different magnification levels: 5×, 10×, and 20×. Our results show that a modified additive implementation of MIL matched the performance of reference implementation (AUC 0.96), and was only slightly outperformed by AMIL (AUC 0.97) on the tumor detection task. TP53 mutation was most sensitive to features at the higher applications where cellular morphology is resolved. More interestingly from the perspective of the molecular pathologist, we highlight the possible ability of these MIL architectures to identify distinct sensitivities to morphological features (through the detection of regions of interest, ROIs) at different amplification levels. This ability for models to obtain tile-level ROIs is very appealing to pathologists as it provides the possibility for these algorithms to be integrated in a digital staining application for analysis, facilitating the navigation through these high-dimensional images and the diagnostic process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100403
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple Instance Learning for WSI: A comparative analysis of attention-based approaches

Arlindo L. Oliveira, Monjoy Saha, Jonas S. Almeida, Praphulla Bhawsar et al.
7 citations
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
1.74
article

Multiple Instance Learning for WSI: A comparative analysis of attention-based approaches

Arlindo L. Oliveira, Monjoy Saha, Jonas S. Almeida, Praphulla Bhawsar, Martim Afonso
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Whole slide images (WSI), obtained by high-resolution digital scanning of microscope slides at multiple scales, are the cornerstone of modern Digital Pathology. However, they represent a particular challenge to artificial intelligence (AI)-based/AI-mediated analysis because pathology labeling is typically done at slide-level, instead of tile-level. It is not just that medical diagnostics is recorded at the specimen level, the detection of oncogene mutation is also experimentally obtained, and recorded by initiatives like The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), at the slide level. This configures a dual challenge: (a) accurately predicting the overall cancer phenotype and (b) finding out what cellular morphologies are associated with it at the tile level. To better understand and address these challenges, two existing weakly supervised Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) approaches were explored and compared: Attention MIL (AMIL) and Additive MIL (AdMIL). These architectures were analyzed on tumor detection (a task where these models obtained good results previously) and TP53 mutation detection (a much less explored task). For tumor detection, we built a dataset from Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma (TCGA-LUSC) slides, with 349 positive and 349 negative slides. The patches were extracted from 5× magnification. For TP53 mutation detection, we explored a dataset built from Invasive Breast Carcinoma (TCGA-BRCA) slides, with 347 positive and 347 negative slides. In this case, we explored three different magnification levels: 5×, 10×, and 20×. Our results show that a modified additive implementation of MIL matched the performance of reference implementation (AUC 0.96), and was only slightly outperformed by AMIL (AUC 0.97) on the tumor detection task. TP53 mutation was most sensitive to features at the higher applications where cellular morphology is resolved. More interestingly from the perspective of the molecular pathologist, we highlight the possible ability of these MIL architectures to identify distinct sensitivities to morphological features (through the detection of regions of interest, ROIs) at different amplification levels. This ability for models to obtain tile-level ROIs is very appealing to pathologists as it provides the possibility for these algorithms to be integrated in a digital staining application for analysis, facilitating the navigation through these high-dimensional images and the diagnostic process.

Journal of Pathology InformaticsVol. 15
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Lisboa (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
1.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.