Title: exploring junior high school students’ critical reading strategies and reading performance

This paper explored the critical reading strategies and reading performance of junior high school (JHS) students enrolled in both public and private schools. 628 JHS answered the adapted survey questionnaire developed by Anderson and Krathwohl (2001) and a researcher-made reading test. The results revealed that JHS students had a high level of awareness of their use of critical reading strategies. However, the results of reading test said otherwise. There is a disconnect with what the students thought they could apply critical reading strategies and their score in the reading test. This paper recommends explicit teaching of critical reading strategies so that JHS students can better prepare themselves for the cognitive and non-cognitive demands in the tertiary level. Furthermore, this paper strongly recommends noncognitive assessments such as reading attitudes and motivations to have a more holistic approach in assessing the critical reading strategies of JHS students.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Education
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2416814
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Title: exploring junior high school students’ critical reading strategies and reading performance

Rosalyn Gunobgunob-Mirasol
2 citations
Cogent Education
Education and Critical Thinking Development
4.19
article

Title: exploring junior high school students’ critical reading strategies and reading performance

Rosalyn Gunobgunob-Mirasol
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper explored the critical reading strategies and reading performance of junior high school (JHS) students enrolled in both public and private schools. 628 JHS answered the adapted survey questionnaire developed by Anderson and Krathwohl (2001) and a researcher-made reading test. The results revealed that JHS students had a high level of awareness of their use of critical reading strategies. However, the results of reading test said otherwise. There is a disconnect with what the students thought they could apply critical reading strategies and their score in the reading test. This paper recommends explicit teaching of critical reading strategies so that JHS students can better prepare themselves for the cognitive and non-cognitive demands in the tertiary level. Furthermore, this paper strongly recommends noncognitive assessments such as reading attitudes and motivations to have a more holistic approach in assessing the critical reading strategies of JHS students.

Cogent EducationVol. 11(1)
University of Santo Tomas (PH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Title: exploring junior high school students’ critical reading strategies and reading performance — Rosalyn Gunobgunob-Mirasol · Cogent Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS