Work-in-Progress: Intra-Body Nanonetworks for In Vivo Biomarker Detection in Capillaries

Advancements in medical diagnostics are crucial for early disease detection and effective treatment. One of the most advanced diagnostic methods is liquid biopsy (LB). It involves analyzing bodily fluids such as blood or saliva samples to identify disease biomarkers (BMs), including proteins, DNA/RNA fragments, and other organic chemicals produced by abnormal cells [3]. Compared to traditional tissue biopsies, LB is less invasive and provides shorter turnaround delays-the time it takes to get laboratory results from the bodily fluid samples. However, current LB methods face significant challenges. They rely on ex vivo processes that involve handling and analyzing samples outside the body, resulting in a turnaround delay of around seven days. Additionally, they can access only a tiny fraction of available BMs, limiting their efficacy in early-stage disease detection when BM concentrations are exceedingly low. For example, only 0.3% of total circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is found in a 15 ml blood sample [2].

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686015.3689424
Primary Topic
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work-in-Progress: Intra-Body Nanonetworks for In Vivo Biomarker Detection in Capillaries

Eduard Alarcón, Ethungshan Shitiri, Sergi Abadal, Filip Lemić et al.
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
article

Work-in-Progress: Intra-Body Nanonetworks for In Vivo Biomarker Detection in Capillaries

Eduard Alarcón, Ethungshan Shitiri, Sergi Abadal, Filip Lemić, Eneko Ibarluzea Sòria, Satvika Santhoshi Marakala
article en

Abstract

Advancements in medical diagnostics are crucial for early disease detection and effective treatment. One of the most advanced diagnostic methods is liquid biopsy (LB). It involves analyzing bodily fluids such as blood or saliva samples to identify disease biomarkers (BMs), including proteins, DNA/RNA fragments, and other organic chemicals produced by abnormal cells [3]. Compared to traditional tissue biopsies, LB is less invasive and provides shorter turnaround delays-the time it takes to get laboratory results from the bodily fluid samples. However, current LB methods face significant challenges. They rely on ex vivo processes that involve handling and analyzing samples outside the body, resulting in a turnaround delay of around seven days. Additionally, they can access only a tiny fraction of available BMs, limiting their efficacy in early-stage disease detection when BM concentrations are exceedingly low. For example, only 0.3% of total circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is found in a 15 ml blood sample [2].

i2CAT (ES), SASTRA University (IN), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.