Enhancing the Completeness of Rationales for Multi-Step Question Answering

Learning to answer multi-step complex questions requires machines to perform like a human to think and reason step by step, which is one of the core abilities of a question answering system. Recent advancements have revealed that large language models exhibit remarkable reasoning capabilities by generating intermediate chain-of-thought rationales. However, the completeness of their rationales lacks assurance as they are susceptible to omitting steps and making factual errors. In this paper, drawing inspiration from human-like reasoning processes in answering multi-step questions, we explicitly plan the rationales to ensure their completeness. We propose a two-stage Decomposition-Evaluation (Dec-Eval) framework including a step decomposition stage and a rationale generation stage. Specifically, in the first stage, we decompose the complex question into simpler sub-ones and simulate a human's ability to grasp logical clues to ensure the integrity of step planning. Then, in the second stage, based on the sub-questions, we generate and evaluate rationales step by step. Both stages work together organically, improving the completeness of rationales and the accuracy of the answer. To further control the question answering process, we propose a novel knowledge injection mechanism that incorporates external knowledge to guide both stages. Extensive experiments on three challenging multi-step QA datasets demonstrate that Dec-Eval can explicitly generate more logical rationales, and significantly improve the reasoning performances of different backbone models.