Prediction of Aphasia Outcome Using Low Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Non-Fluent Aphasia

Background: Stroke, a global health concern, often leads to language impairment (aphasia). In Egypt, with a high stroke prevalence, aphasia affects a significant number of survivors. Noninvasive techniques like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) show promise in rehabilitation. Cultural variations in test results emphasize the need for region-specific considerations in standardized assessments for post-stroke care. Aim of the work: To evaluate the role of low frequency rTMS to speed up the recovery of post-stroke aphasia for a better quality of life. Patients and Methods: This randomized clinical trial investigates the effects of (rTMS) on post-stroke aphasia. Patients with post-stroke non-fluent aphasia were divided into two groups, with one receiving inhibitory rTMS and the other sham sessions. Inclusion criteria involve adults with a single left hemisphere stroke, while exclusion criteria include prior strokes. The study includes comprehensive assessments for aphasia, and depression. The stimulation protocol involves 20 minutes of daily rTMS for ten days, targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus. The study aims to evaluate the rTMS impact on language recovery. Results: The study evaluated low-frequency rTMS for post-stroke aphasia recovery in 30 patients, comparing TMS and sham groups. No significant demographic or cerebrovascular risk factor differences were found. While rTMS group showed improvement in depression, there were no significant differences between TMS and sham groups in aphasia improvement. Conclusion: Low-frequency rTMS demonstrated no significant superiority over sham stimulation in post-stroke aphasia recovery. Both groups exhibited improved depression without notable distinctions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Scientific Journal of Medical Scholar
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55675/sjms.v3i5.113
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Aphasia Outcome Using Low Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Non-Fluent Aphasia

Azza Bayoumi Hammad, Sara Saber, Yossra Sallam, S Ahmed et al.
The Scientific Journal of Medical Scholar
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Prediction of Aphasia Outcome Using Low Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-Stroke Non-Fluent Aphasia

Azza Bayoumi Hammad, Sara Saber, Yossra Sallam, S Ahmed, Hayam Abdel-Tawab Mawad
article en

Abstract

Background: Stroke, a global health concern, often leads to language impairment (aphasia). In Egypt, with a high stroke prevalence, aphasia affects a significant number of survivors. Noninvasive techniques like repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) show promise in rehabilitation. Cultural variations in test results emphasize the need for region-specific considerations in standardized assessments for post-stroke care. Aim of the work: To evaluate the role of low frequency rTMS to speed up the recovery of post-stroke aphasia for a better quality of life. Patients and Methods: This randomized clinical trial investigates the effects of (rTMS) on post-stroke aphasia. Patients with post-stroke non-fluent aphasia were divided into two groups, with one receiving inhibitory rTMS and the other sham sessions. Inclusion criteria involve adults with a single left hemisphere stroke, while exclusion criteria include prior strokes. The study includes comprehensive assessments for aphasia, and depression. The stimulation protocol involves 20 minutes of daily rTMS for ten days, targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus. The study aims to evaluate the rTMS impact on language recovery. Results: The study evaluated low-frequency rTMS for post-stroke aphasia recovery in 30 patients, comparing TMS and sham groups. No significant demographic or cerebrovascular risk factor differences were found. While rTMS group showed improvement in depression, there were no significant differences between TMS and sham groups in aphasia improvement. Conclusion: Low-frequency rTMS demonstrated no significant superiority over sham stimulation in post-stroke aphasia recovery. Both groups exhibited improved depression without notable distinctions.

The Scientific Journal of Medical Scholar
Al-Azhar University (EG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.