Engaging with Children's Artwork in Mixed Visual-Ability Families

We present two studies exploring how blind or low-vision (BLV) family members engage with their sighted children’s artwork, strategies to support understanding and interpretation, and the potential role of technology, such as AI, therein. Our first study involved 14 BLV individuals, and the second included five groups of BLV individuals with their children. Through semi-structured interviews with AI descriptions of children’s artwork and multi-sensory design probes, we found that BLV family members value artwork engagement as a bonding opportunity, preferring the child’s storytelling and interpretation over other nonvisual representations. Additionally, despite some inaccuracies, BLV family members felt that AI-generated descriptions could facilitate dialogue with their children and aid self-guided art discovery. We close with specific design considerations for supporting artwork engagement in mixed visual-ability families, including enabling artwork access through various methods, supporting children’s corrections of AI output, and distinctions in context vs. content and interpretation vs. description of children’s artwork.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3663548.3675613
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Art Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
38.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Engaging with Children's Artwork in Mixed Visual-Ability Families

Jon E. Froehlich, Jacob O. Wobbrock, Arnavi Chheda-Kothary
6 citations
Art Education and Development
38.95
article

Engaging with Children's Artwork in Mixed Visual-Ability Families

Jon E. Froehlich, Jacob O. Wobbrock, Arnavi Chheda-Kothary
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We present two studies exploring how blind or low-vision (BLV) family members engage with their sighted children’s artwork, strategies to support understanding and interpretation, and the potential role of technology, such as AI, therein. Our first study involved 14 BLV individuals, and the second included five groups of BLV individuals with their children. Through semi-structured interviews with AI descriptions of children’s artwork and multi-sensory design probes, we found that BLV family members value artwork engagement as a bonding opportunity, preferring the child’s storytelling and interpretation over other nonvisual representations. Additionally, despite some inaccuracies, BLV family members felt that AI-generated descriptions could facilitate dialogue with their children and aid self-guided art discovery. We close with specific design considerations for supporting artwork engagement in mixed visual-ability families, including enabling artwork access through various methods, supporting children’s corrections of AI output, and distinctions in context vs. content and interpretation vs. description of children’s artwork.

University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Art Education and Development
38.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.