Voice coding experiences for developers with physical impairments

Purpose This research explores the current working practices of voice coders with physical impairments and investigates their perceptions of a research prototype utilising a fixed grammar speech coding approach. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were initially conducted with seven voice coders with physical impairments to understand their development practices, followed by an exploratory user study with five disabled voice coders to obtain their feedback on a fixed grammar voice coding system. Findings Interviews provided new insights around the tools voice coders utilise, the need for multimodal coding approaches, as well as experiences in working within mixed ability development teams. Findings from the user evaluation elicited views around the need for distinct monosyllable voice commands, as well as other requirements to support efficient voice coding (e.g. command chaining, intuitive navigation, and custom command definition). Research limitations/implications The research was conducted with experienced voice coders which may have influenced perceptions of the voice coding prototype. The system was also evaluated over a single evaluation session, whereas longitudinal research with novice voice coders could also present additional insights. Practical implications Further research is required into customisable multimodal voice coding approaches for developers with physical impairments who may have varying levels of experience in coding via alternative methods. Originality/value The findings present new insights around the working practices and unique requirements of voice coders with physical impairments and highlights important new avenues for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Enabling Technologies
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jet-02-2024-0021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Voice coding experiences for developers with physical impairments

Chris Creed, Sayan Sarcar
1 citations
Journal of Enabling Technologies
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
2.19
article

Voice coding experiences for developers with physical impairments

Chris Creed, Sayan Sarcar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This research explores the current working practices of voice coders with physical impairments and investigates their perceptions of a research prototype utilising a fixed grammar speech coding approach. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews were initially conducted with seven voice coders with physical impairments to understand their development practices, followed by an exploratory user study with five disabled voice coders to obtain their feedback on a fixed grammar voice coding system. Findings Interviews provided new insights around the tools voice coders utilise, the need for multimodal coding approaches, as well as experiences in working within mixed ability development teams. Findings from the user evaluation elicited views around the need for distinct monosyllable voice commands, as well as other requirements to support efficient voice coding (e.g. command chaining, intuitive navigation, and custom command definition). Research limitations/implications The research was conducted with experienced voice coders which may have influenced perceptions of the voice coding prototype. The system was also evaluated over a single evaluation session, whereas longitudinal research with novice voice coders could also present additional insights. Practical implications Further research is required into customisable multimodal voice coding approaches for developers with physical impairments who may have varying levels of experience in coding via alternative methods. Originality/value The findings present new insights around the working practices and unique requirements of voice coders with physical impairments and highlights important new avenues for future research.

Journal of Enabling TechnologiesVol. 18(4)
Birmingham City University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
2.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.