A Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and Global Workspace Theory

One common attitude towards AI is that existing AIs are not phenomenally conscious, and that the construction of conscious Ais would require significant technological progress if it is possible at all. We challenge this assumption by arguing that if global workspace theory (GWT) — a leading scientific theory of phenomenal consciousness — is correct, then instances of one widely implemented AI architecture, the artificial language agent, might easily be made phenomenally conscious if they are not already. Moreover, we argue that artificial language agents have further properties that should allay the concerns of many who are sceptical of GWT as a complete theory of phenomenal consciousness. Along the way, we articulate an explicit methodology for thinking about how to apply scientific theories of consciousness to artificial systems and employ this methodology to arrive at a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for phenomenal consciousness according to GWT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Consciousness Studies
Published
2026-07-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.33.7.061
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and Global Workspace Theory

Cameron Domenico Kirk‐Giannini, Simon Goldstein
4 citations
Journal of Consciousness Studies
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and Global Workspace Theory

Cameron Domenico Kirk‐Giannini, Simon Goldstein
article en
4 citations

Abstract

One common attitude towards AI is that existing AIs are not phenomenally conscious, and that the construction of conscious Ais would require significant technological progress if it is possible at all. We challenge this assumption by arguing that if global workspace theory (GWT) — a leading scientific theory of phenomenal consciousness — is correct, then instances of one widely implemented AI architecture, the artificial language agent, might easily be made phenomenally conscious if they are not already. Moreover, we argue that artificial language agents have further properties that should allay the concerns of many who are sceptical of GWT as a complete theory of phenomenal consciousness. Along the way, we articulate an explicit methodology for thinking about how to apply scientific theories of consciousness to artificial systems and employ this methodology to arrive at a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for phenomenal consciousness according to GWT.

Journal of Consciousness StudiesVol. 33(7)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 100%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.