Material Selection for Metal Additive Manufacturing Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods

Additive manufacturing has attracted attention as a new generation manufacturing method that has found widespread use in many industries in recent years due to its many advantages over traditional manufacturing methods. The materials used in metal additive manufacturing technology have a wide range. Therefore, making the ideal choice among these preferable materials is very important. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques are reliable and effective methods in material selection processes and are effectively used in material selection processes. In this study, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) methods were applied to the selection process among different criteria and materials for metal additive manufacturing. It was observed that AlSi12Cu2Fe material ranked first in the TOPSIS method, while H13 material ranked first in the ARAS method. The second place was taken by H13 material in the TOPSIS method and AlSi12Cu2Fe material in the ARAS method. A strong relationship exists between TOPSIS and ARAS methods with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.977. It has been concluded that it will be more effective to decide according to the nature of the technological application in the use of the materials that rank first two in TOPSIS and ARAS methods in additive manufacturing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research
Published
2024-10-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47933/ijeir.1525040
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Material Selection for Metal Additive Manufacturing Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods

Batuhan Özakın, Kürşat Gülteki̇n
International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Research
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Material Selection for Metal Additive Manufacturing Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods

Batuhan Özakın, Kürşat Gülteki̇n
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has attracted attention as a new generation manufacturing method that has found widespread use in many industries in recent years due to its many advantages over traditional manufacturing methods. The materials used in metal additive manufacturing technology have a wide range. Therefore, making the ideal choice among these preferable materials is very important. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques are reliable and effective methods in material selection processes and are effectively used in material selection processes. In this study, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) and Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) methods were applied to the selection process among different criteria and materials for metal additive manufacturing. It was observed that AlSi12Cu2Fe material ranked first in the TOPSIS method, while H13 material ranked first in the ARAS method. The second place was taken by H13 material in the TOPSIS method and AlSi12Cu2Fe material in the ARAS method. A strong relationship exists between TOPSIS and ARAS methods with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.977. It has been concluded that it will be more effective to decide according to the nature of the technological application in the use of the materials that rank first two in TOPSIS and ARAS methods in additive manufacturing.

International Journal of Engineering and Innovative ResearchVol. 6(3)
Ondokuz Mayıs University (TR), Samsun University (TR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.