A Comparative Evaluation of Embodied Environmental Impacts of Channel StabilisationUsing Concrete Lining and Alternative Pozzolanic Materials

Channel stabilisation with the lining of bed/ banks using cement-concrete (with/ without steel reinforcement as per the size, depth, and capacity), geomembrane, polymers, canvas, ramped earth, vegetation, gravel/ stone pitching, and brick blast is a common practice worldwide to save the adjacent flood plain areas from bank overflowing, seepage, water logging/ salinity, loss of water in irrigation channels, maintaining required water levels and strengthening of channels to be used as transportation means. A trapezoidal channel of cross-section 165 m2 and a lined perimeter of 42m was proposed to accommodate a super flood of 360 m3/sec discharge for a catchment area of 1446 km2 and 118 km length, using a projected heavy flood event of 6 cm precipitation in 8 hours for Swale River to ascertain the material calculation and its environmental impact. This concrete lining would likely produce an equivalent global warming potential/ embodied carbon dioxide (CO2) of 284 million kgCO2eq (kilogram CO2 equivalent) with the projected use of around 271 million kg of cement concrete and 78 million kg of steel. The enormous amount of embodied CO2 emissions from this projected lining project suggested using natural means of flood/ channel protection if feasible, or alternative supplementary cementitious materials with fibres should be used to minimise the environmental impacts.